Literature DB >> 1403929

Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible.

H J Meijer1, J H Kuiper, F J Starmans, F Bosman.   

Abstract

The stress distribution around dental implants was investigated by use of a two-dimensional model of the mandible with two implants. A vertical load of 100 N was imposed on abutments or the bar connection. The stress was calculated for a number of superstructures under different loading conditions with the help of the finite element method. The length of the implants and the height of the mandible were also varied. A model with solitary abutments showed a more uniform distribution of the stress when compared with a model with connected abutments. The largest compressive stress was also less in the model without the bar. Using shorter implants did not have a large influence on the stress around the implants. When the height of the mandible was reduced, a substantially larger stress was found in the bone around the implants because of a larger overall deformation of the lower jaw.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1403929     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90293-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  31 in total

1.  Study of Biomechanics of Porous Coated Root Form Implant Using Overdenture Attachment: A 3D FEA.

Authors:  Ravindra C Savadi; Chhavi Goyal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-02-01

2.  Stress Distribution Around Single Short Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  S Vidya Bhat; Priyanka Premkumar; K Kamalakanth Shenoy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-09-10

3.  Angulated abutments and perimplants stress: F.E.M. analysis.

Authors:  P Cardelli; M Montani; M Gallio; M Biancolini; C Brutti; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2009-12-10

4.  A finite element analysis of stress distribution in the bone, around the implant supporting a mandibular overdenture with ball/o ring and magnetic attachment.

Authors:  Jins John; V Rangarajan; Ravindra C Savadi; K S Satheesh Kumar; Preeti Satheesh Kumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-03-09

5.  Stress distribution in implant retained finger prosthesis: a finite element study.

Authors:  Pokpong Amornvit; Dinesh Rokaya; Konrawee Keawcharoen; Nimit Thongpulsawasdi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

6.  Evaluation of stress distribution in bone of different densities using different implant designs: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  K Premnath; J Sridevi; N Kalavathy; Prakash Nagaranjani; M Ranganath Sharmila
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-10-26

7.  Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Thiyaneswaran Nesappan; Padma Ariga
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-08-20

8.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a newly designed onplant miniplate anchorage system.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Yin-Ying Qu; Li-Jun Jiang; Qian Zhou; Tian-Qi Tang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-05

9.  Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length.

Authors:  Jin Suk Yoo; Kung-Rock Kwon; Kwantae Noh; Hyeonjong Lee; Janghyun Paek
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Predicting Peri-implant Stresses Around Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants-A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Manmohan Choudary Gujjarlapudi; Narayana Venkata Nunna; Sanjay Dutt Manne; Varalakshmi Reddy Sarikonda; Praveen Kumar Madineni; Reddi Narasimha Rao Meruva
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.