Literature DB >> 25302267

Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.

Thiyaneswaran Nesappan1, Padma Ariga2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was formulated to evaluate and compare stresses around endosseous implants in various normal and fibula reconstructed mandibular models using finite element analysis method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scan data of a completely edentulous patient and a fibula reconstructed patient was made and the Dicom images were used to design 3-D mandibular models using software. Based on the information from the scan data, various types of reconstructed FEA models were made. Implants (fixtures) and superstructures were then embedded in each model and Von Mises stress around the neck of each implant under a vertical loading of 200 N and Horizontal load of 50 N was calculated using finite element structural analysis software. The results were compared between the reconstructed mandible and their respective normal mandible.
RESULTS: Higher stress values were obtained for all the reconstructed types under horizontal loading and in reconstructed models involving larger area of reconstruction the stress were more. In the models involving smaller area of reconstruction like symphysis alone or body alone there is no significant change in the stress values on vertical loading.
CONCLUSION: Stresses were comparatively smaller in mandibles involving a smaller area of reconstruction. Hence, fixed prosthesis could be advised and a bar retained over denture for reconstruction for larger area of reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fibula graft; Finite element analysis; Mandible reconstruction; Mandible rehabilitation; Von mises stress

Year:  2014        PMID: 25302267      PMCID: PMC4190793          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9147.4764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  21 in total

1.  Comparative radiologic study of bone density and cortical thickness of donor bone used in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  H Myoung; Y Y Kim; M S Heo; S S Lee; S C Choi; M J Kim
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-07

Review 2.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J P Geng; K B Tan; G R Liu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Mandibular flexure and stress build-up in mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants.

Authors:  Fernando Zarone; Antonio Apicella; Luigi Nicolais; Raffaella Aversa; Roberto Sorrentino
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Masticatory and swallowing threshold performances with conventional and implant-supported prostheses after mandibular fibula free-flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Eleni D Roumanas; Neal Garrett; Keith E Blackwell; Earl Freymiller; Elliot Abemayor; Weng Kee Wong; John Beumer; Kenji Fueki; Warawan Fueki; Krishan K Kapur
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants.

Authors:  Jose Henrique Rubo; Edson Antonio Capello Souza
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction.

Authors:  D A Hidalgo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Use of the "double barrel" free vascularized fibula in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  W Bähr; P Stoll; R Wächter
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Efficacy of dental implants placed into fibula-free flaps for orofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Franz-Josef Kramer; Rupert Dempf; Bernd Bremer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  Gurcan Eskitascioglu; Aslihan Usumez; Mujde Sevimay; Emel Soykan; Elif Unsal
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Bite force and oral function in patients with osseointegrated oral implants.

Authors:  T Haraldson; G E Carlsson
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1977-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.