Literature DB >> 24431734

Predicting Peri-implant Stresses Around Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants-A Finite Element Analysis.

Manmohan Choudary Gujjarlapudi1, Narayana Venkata Nunna2, Sanjay Dutt Manne3, Varalakshmi Reddy Sarikonda1, Praveen Kumar Madineni1, Reddi Narasimha Rao Meruva4.   

Abstract

Due to anatomical and surgical constrains the implant placement may not be parallel to each other always. Non-parallel implants are subjected to detrimental stresses at implant bone interface. Also depending on type of implant material i.e. titanium or zirconium, stresses tend to vary due to change in physical and mechanical properties. Hence stress analysis at implant bone interface between different parallel and non-parallel implants becomes significant. Evaluation and comparison of stress distribution in the bone around two parallel and non-parallel titanium and zirconium dental implants on axial and non-axial loading supporting three unit fixed prosthesis. Three dimensional finite element models (M1, M2, M3) were made of three differently angulated implants in ANSYS (11.0 Version) software and P4 processor with a speed of 3 GHz and 3 Gb RAM hardware, common for titanium and zirconium implants. Stress around the implants was analyzed on an axial load of 200 N and a non-axial load of 50 N. In both titanium and zirconium implants on axial loading in cortical bone, higher stresses were observed in M3 followed by M2 and M1. On non-axial loading higher stresses were observed in M2, followed by M3 and M1. In both titanium and zirconium implants on axial and non-axial loading in cancellous bone stresses were higher in M3 followed by M2 and M1. Zirconium implants showed lower stresses in cortical bone and higher stresses in cancellous bone compared to titanium implants. Over all Stresses in the bone were more due to titanium implants than zirconium implants. Zirconium implants led to lower peri-implant stresses than titanium implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element analysis; Implant bone interface; Stress around implants; von Mises stress

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431734      PMCID: PMC3732719          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0257-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  15 in total

Review 1.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J P Geng; K B Tan; G R Liu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Indications for angled implants.

Authors:  C M ten Bruggenkate; F Sutter; H S Oosterbeek; A Schroeder
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 3.  Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants.

Authors:  M R Rieger; K Fareed; W K Adams; R A Tanquist
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.

Authors:  Murat Sütpideler; Steven E Eckert; Mark Zobitz; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  A time-dependent healing function for immediate loaded implants.

Authors:  W Winter; S M Heckmann; H P Weber
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis.

Authors:  S Canay; N Hersek; I Akpinar; Z Aşik
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.677

7.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function.

Authors:  G Papavasiliou; P Kamposiora; S C Bayne; D A Felton
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Loading conditions of endosseous implants in an edentulous human mandible: a three-dimensional, finite-element study.

Authors:  H J Meijer; F J Starmans; W H Steen; F Bosman
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  A model for the implant-bone interface characteristics of porous dental implants.

Authors:  S D Cook; J J Klawitter; A M Weinstein
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Zirconia implants and all-ceramic restorations for the esthetic replacement of the maxillary central incisors.

Authors:  Josep Oliva; Xavi Oliva; Josep D Oliva
Journal:  Eur J Esthet Dent       Date:  2008
View more
  1 in total

1.  Finite element evaluation to compare stress pattern in bone surrounding implant with carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone and commercially pure titanium implants.

Authors:  Syeda Amtul Haseeb; Vinaya K C; Neha Vijaykumar; Anju Sree Durga B; Anju S Kumar; Sruthi M K
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-07-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.