Literature DB >> 26199508

Stress Distribution Around Single Short Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study.

S Vidya Bhat1, Priyanka Premkumar1, K Kamalakanth Shenoy1.   

Abstract

Bone height restrictions are more common in the posterior regions of the mandible, because of either bone resorption resulting from tooth loss or even anatomic limitations, such as the position of the inferior alveolar nerve. In situations where adequate bone height is not available in the posterior mandible region, smaller lengths of implants may have to be used but it has been reported that the use of long implants (length ≥10 mm) is a positive factor in osseointegration and authors have reported failures with short implants. Hence knowledge about the stress generated on the bone with different lengths of implants needs scientific evaluation. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the influence of different lengths of implants on stress upon bone in mandibular posterior area. A 3 D finite element model was made of the posterior mandible using the details from a CT scan, using computer software (ANSYS 12). Four simulated implants with lengths 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm and 13 mm were placed in the centre of the bone. A static vertical force of 250 N and a static horizontal force of 100 N were applied. The stress generated in the cortical and cancellous bone around the implant were recorded and evaluated with the help of ANSYS. In this study, Von Mises stress on a 6 mm implant under a static vertical load of 250 N appeared to be almost in the same range of 8 and 10 mm implant which were more as compared to 13 mm implant. Von Mises stress on a 6mm implant under a static horizontal load of 100 N appeared to be less when compared to 8, 10 and 13 mm implants. From the results obtained it may be inferred that under static horizontal loading conditions, shorter implants receive lesser load and thus may tend to transfer more stresses to the surrounding bone. While under static vertical loading the shorter implants bear more loads and comparatively transmit lesser load to the surrounding bone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element analysis; Implant length; Posterior mandible

Year:  2014        PMID: 26199508      PMCID: PMC4502034          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-014-0390-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  23 in total

1.  The distal extension case: an alternative restorative design for implant prosthetics.

Authors:  N L Starr
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J P Geng; K B Tan; G R Liu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.

Authors:  M R Norton; C Gamble
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 4.  Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review.

Authors:  Jae-Hoon Lee; Val Frias; Keun-Woo Lee; Robert F Wright
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Cortical bone thickness in dentate and edentulous human cadavers.

Authors:  Amar Katranji; Kelly Misch; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.

Authors:  Chun-Li Lin; Shih-Hao Chang; Wen-Jen Chang; Yu-Chan Kuo
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.612

7.  Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  T Li; L Kong; Y Wang; K Hu; L Song; B Liu; D Li; J Shao; Y Ding
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.

Authors:  Xi Ding; Sheng-Hui Liao; Xing-Hao Zhu; Xiu-Hua Zhang; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 3.932

9.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function.

Authors:  G Papavasiliou; P Kamposiora; S C Bayne; D A Felton
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses.

Authors:  P P van Zyl; N L Grundling; C H Jooste; E Terblanche
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The Prosthetic Influence and Biomechanics on Peri-Implant Strain: a Systematic Literature Review of Finite Element Studies.

Authors:  Julius Maminskas; Algirdas Puisys; Ritva Kuoppala; Aune Raustia; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

2.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of extra short implants focusing on implant designs and materials.

Authors:  Haruka Araki; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Hirofumi Yatani
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-01-29

3.  Influence of Implant Dimensions in the Resorbed and Bone Augmented Mandible: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Doriana Agop Forna; Norina Consuela Forna; Sînziana Anca Butnaru Moldoveanu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2020-12-20

4.  The rehabilitation of posterior atrophic maxilla by using the graftless option of short implant versus conventional long implant with sinus graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Sachin Haribhau Chaware; Vrushali Thakare; Ritu Chaudhary; Ajit Jankar; Smruti Thakkar; Sidesh Borse
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

5.  Effect of joining the sectioned implant-supported prosthesis on the peri-implant strain generated in simulated mandibular model.

Authors:  Ipsha Singh; K Chandrasekharan Nair; Jayakar Shetty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.