Literature DB >> 24431792

Evaluation of stress distribution in bone of different densities using different implant designs: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

K Premnath1, J Sridevi2, N Kalavathy2, Prakash Nagaranjani3, M Ranganath Sharmila2.   

Abstract

A key factor for the success or failure of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. This depends on the type of loading, bone-implant interface, the shape and characteristics of the implant surface and the quality and quantity of the surrounding bone. This study was done to evaluate the pattern of stress distribution with two different implant designs in four different densities of bone using 3D finite element analysis. Graphic pre-processing software Ansys version 10 was used for creating the geometric configuration of a section of the mandible with a missing first molar. Eight 3D models of this section restored with implant-supported all ceramic crowns were created. Four of these models were created to simulate a single threaded implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3 and D4). The other four models were created to simulate a single cylindrical implant placed in four different densities of bone (D1, D2, D3, and D4). The Poisson's ratio (μ) and Young's modulus (E) of elasticity of the material were incorporated into the model. An average vertical load of 400 N was applied on the occlusal surface of the first molar between the buccal cusp, central fossa and the marginal ridge. Maximum Von Mises stresses in all the eight models were observed at the crestal region or neck of the implant. The stresses observed were more for the threaded implants in all the four densities of bone when compared to that of the cylindrical implants. The study concluded that the cylindrical implant design was more favorable in softer bone than the threaded implant design.

Keywords:  Bone density; Cylindrical implant; Finite element analysis; Finite element models; Threaded implant

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431792      PMCID: PMC3792329          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0189-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  8 in total

Review 1.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J P Geng; K B Tan; G R Liu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible.

Authors:  H J Meijer; J H Kuiper; F J Starmans; F Bosman
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures.

Authors:  Sawako Yokoyama; Noriyuki Wakabayashi; Makoto Shiota; Takashi Ohyama
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Finite element analysis of three designs of an implant-supported molar crown.

Authors:  Allahyar Geramy; Steven M Morgano
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 5.  Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review.

Authors:  Jae-Hoon Lee; Val Frias; Keun-Woo Lee; Robert F Wright
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function.

Authors:  G Papavasiliou; P Kamposiora; S C Bayne; D A Felton
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.

Authors:  M Sevimay; F Turhan; M A Kiliçarslan; G Eskitascioglu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Success and failure rates of cylinder implants in type IV bone.

Authors:  P A Fugazzotto; S L Wheeler; J A Lindsay
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.993

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of the influence of implant shape on primary stability using the correlation of multiple methods.

Authors:  Mariana Lima da Costa Valente; Denise Tornavoi de Castro; Antonio Carlos Shimano; César Penazzo Lepri; Andréa Cândido dos Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Holmes; Kartik Bulusu; Michael Plesniak; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.874

3.  Correlation between abutment angulation and off-axial stresses on biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconium implants in the anterior maxilla: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Harilal Guguloth; Chalapathi Rao Duggineni; Ravi Kumar Chitturi; M Sujesh; T Ravvali; Roja Roshan Amiti
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019-10-10

Review 4.  Endosseous Dental Implant Materials and Clinical Outcomes of Different Alloys: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luca Fiorillo; Marco Cicciù; Tolga Fikret Tozum; Matteo Saccucci; Cristiano Orlando; Giovanni Luca Romano; Cesare D'Amico; Gabriele Cervino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Feasibility analysis of an ultrasound on line diagnostic approach for oral and bone surgery.

Authors:  Maria Alessandra Cutolo; Carlo Cafiero; Luigi Califano; Martino Giaquinto; Andrea Cusano; Antonello Cutolo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.