Literature DB >> 11142750

Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.

D Keating1, S Parks, A Evans.   

Abstract

There are a wide range of variables which can influence the quality of the multifocal response. It is possible to place these variables into one of four categories. First, the method of stimulus delivery will determine the field of view, interference levels and the duration of on-state stimulation. Second, data acquisition variables such as electrode type and placement, amplifier specifications and filter bandwidth settings will have a direct impact on waveform shape and on the topographic distribution of signal amplitudes. Third, patient variables such as fixation, pupil dilation and refractive error will also contribute to the multifocal response. Fourth, there are many measurements that can be taken from multifocal recordings. In addition to standard amplitude and implicit time measures (the implicit time measure in the multifocal response is becoming increasingly important particularly in early stages of disease processes), the scalar product measure provides information on waveform shape. The conventional impulse and higher order responses will be different for different modes of stimulation such as Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) and Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) systems and latency shifts will be introduced if not corrected in software. Procedures which could lead to misleading interpretation include artefact rejection, averaging with neighbours and summing of responses. These procedures should be handled with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11142750     DOI: 10.1023/a:1002723501303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  17 in total

1.  The field topography of ERG components in man--I. The photopic luminance response.

Authors:  E E Sutter; D Tran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti-blue opsin.

Authors:  C A Curcio; K A Allen; K R Sloan; C L Lerea; J B Hurley; I B Klock; A H Milam
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1991-10-22       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field.

Authors:  H A Baseler; E E Sutter; S A Klein; T Carney
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-01

4.  Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms.

Authors:  M W Seeliger; U H Kretschmann; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; E Zrenner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Functional imaging of the retina using the multifocal electroretinograph: a control study.

Authors:  S Parks; D Keating; T H Williamson; A L Evans; A T Elliott; J L Jay
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Multifocal electroretinography in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  M Seeliger; U Kretschmann; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; K Rüther; E Zrenner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Multifocal electroretinogram delays reveal local retinal dysfunction in early diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  B Fortune; M E Schneck; A J Adams
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique.

Authors:  D C Hood; K Holopigian; V Greenstein; W Seiple; J Li; E E Sutter; R E Carr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Three-dimensional electromagnetic model of the human eye: advances towards the optimisation of electroretinographic signal detection.

Authors:  H M Job; D Keating; A L Evans; S Parks
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.602

View more
  15 in total

1.  The impact of fixation on the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  J A Chisholm; D Keating; S Parks; A L Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Spectral characteristics of light sources for S-cone stimulation.

Authors:  F Schlegelmilch; R Nolte; K Schellhorn; P Husar; G Henning; R P Tornow
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Potential diagnostic dilemmas using the multifocal electroretinogram in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  C Bellmann; M M Neveu; L Kousoulides; J J Sloper; A C Bird; G E Holder
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The effects of pupil size on the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  P Gonzalez; S Parks; F Dolan; D Keating
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Effects of unsteady fixation on multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG).

Authors:  Patrick H W Chu; Henry H L Chan; Susan J Leat
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; Gungor Sobaci; Mehmet Z Bayraktar
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  A comparison of the suitability of cathode ray tube (CRT) and liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors as visual stimulators in mfERG diagnostics.

Authors:  Christoph Kaltwasser; Folkert K Horn; Jan Kremers; Anselm Juenemann
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  The effect of filtering on the two-global-flash mfERG: identifying the optimal range of frequency for detecting glaucomatous retinal dysfunction.

Authors:  Anna A Ledolter; Sophie A Kramer; Margarita G Todorova; Andreas Schötzau; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Fundus motion during mfERG testing.

Authors:  Jennyffer D Smith; Allison Jussel; Rachel Wang; Daniel R Coates; Wendy W Harrison
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode.

Authors:  Ángel García-García; Francisco José Muñoz-Negrete; Gema Rebolleda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.