Literature DB >> 18322719

Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram.

Fatih C Gundogan1, Gungor Sobaci, Mehmet Z Bayraktar.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Right eyes of 20 healthy adult subjects with uncorrected visual acuity of 1.0 were studied. mfERG recordings were obtained in two sessions by using jet corneal electrodes. The responses were averaged over five retinal regions, the central hexagon (CH: 0.0-2.3 degrees ) and four concentric rings [ring 1 (R1: 2.3-7.4 degrees ), ring 2 (R2: 7.4-12.0 degrees ), ring 3 (R3: 12.0-19.4 degrees ), and ring 4 (R4: 19.4-30.0 degrees )]. In the first session, recordings were repeated while the electrodes stayed in place (the first and the second recordings). Second sessions (third recordings) were performed 1 week later. Individual coefficient of variation (CV; standard deviation/mean) for P1 and N1 amplitudes and implicit times were calculated for the first to second and first to third recordings to assess intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability, respectively, and were evaluated by Wilcoxon-paired samples test. Regarding implicit time and amplitude of mfERG recordings, there was no significant difference between the first to second and first to third recordings (P > 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon test). CV values significantly decreased with eccentricity in both intra-sessional and inter-sessional comparisons (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). However, partial ring averaging showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) between CV values for single hexagons in each ring. Intra-sessional CV values were significantly lower than corresponding inter-sessional values (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). Our results support the importance of electrode replacement on variability. The increased number of hexagons that are averaged is the main factor that explains the lower variability in the more peripheral rings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18322719     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-008-9119-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

1.  The effect of time of day and repeat reliability on the fast flicker multifocal ERG.

Authors:  B Heinemann-Vernaleken; A Palmowski; R Allgayer
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes.

Authors:  D C Hood; X Zhang
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.

Authors:  D Keating; S Parks; A Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  [The reproducibility of multifocal ERG recordings].

Authors:  T Meigen; A Friedrich
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Reproducibility and wave analysis of multifocal electroretinography].

Authors:  K Aoyagi; Y Kimura; H Isono; H Akiyama; T Sugawara
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1998-05

6.  Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms.

Authors:  M W Seeliger; U H Kretschmann; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; E Zrenner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  [Normal values of retinal response densities in multifocal electroretinogram].

Authors:  M Kondo; Y Miyake; M Horiguchi; S Suzuki; Y Ito; A Tanikawa
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1996-10

8.  Test-retest reliability of the multifocal electroretinogram and humphrey visual fields in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  William Seiple; Colleen J Clemens; Vivienne C Greenstein; Ronald E Carr; Karen Holopigian
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  6 in total

1.  The effects of fundus photography on the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Sandip Suresh; Brian J Tienor; Scott D Smith; Michael S Lee
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Clinical usefulness of binocular multifocal electroretinography in patients with monocular macular disease.

Authors:  Jee Wook Kim; Youn Joo Choi; Seung Yup Lee; Kyung Seek Choi
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-28

3.  Foveal amplitudes of multifocal electroretinograms are larger following full-field electroretinograms.

Authors:  Wendy Harrison; Kaila Osmotherly; Nathan Biancardi; Jamison Langston; Russell Gray; Taylor Kneip; Reese Loveless
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Macular function and morphology in acute retinal pigment epithelitis.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; Oktay Diner; Ahmet Tas; Abdullah Ilhan; Umit Yolcu
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Reproducibility of the mfERG between instruments.

Authors:  Wendy W Harrison; Marcus A Bearse; Jason S Ng; Shirin Barez; Marilyn E Schneck; Anthony J Adams
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Photopic Negative Response Obtained Using a Handheld Electroretinogram Device: Determining the Optimal Measure and Repeatability.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Xavier Hadoux; Flora Hui; Marc G Sarossy; Jonathan G Crowston
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.