Literature DB >> 16550403

Effects of unsteady fixation on multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG).

Patrick H W Chu1, Henry H L Chan, Susan J Leat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of unsteady fixation on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) measurement in normal subjects.
METHODS: The mfERGs of 20 subjects with normal vision (mean age=23.5 years) were recorded with different levels of voluntary eye movements made to mimic unsteady fixation. Subjects were required to move their fixation regularly every 2 s between the center and the ends of a fixation cross, so that 51.2% of the time fixation was at the center and 12.2% of the time it was at each end of the fixation cross. Four different conditions were performed: central fixation (without voluntary eye movements) and with 2 degrees, 4 degrees and 6 degrees magnitude of unsteady fixation. First-order kernel mfERG findings are presented.
RESULTS: Analysis of the ring responses indicated that the central mfERG amplitude was most affected by unsteady fixation. There was significantly reduced amplitude for 4 degrees unsteady fixation and as expected, this reduction became larger with 6 degrees unstable fixation. However, there was no significant effect on the center hexagon amplitude for 2 degrees unsteady fixation. The amplitudes of the ring-2 responses were only affected in the 6 degrees unsteady fixation condition. No significant change in implicit time was found for any level of unsteady fixation.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that mfERG amplitude is not substantially affected if fixation is maintained within the central stimulus hexagon. We conclude that, for patients with poor fixation, the accuracy of mfERG results may be difficult to interpret and the use of a fixation-monitoring system is desirable for ideal measurement. The depth of depression at the blind spot area may be another useful parameter to interpret the accuracy of mfERG results in patients with poor fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16550403     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0304-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  31 in total

1.  The multifocal electroretinogram in age-related maculopathies.

Authors:  S Huang; D Wu; F Jiang; J Ma; L Wu; J Liang; G Luo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The impact of fixation on the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  J A Chisholm; D Keating; S Parks; A L Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Scanning laser ophthalmoscope-evoked multifocal ERG (SLO-mfERG) in patients with macular holes and normal individuals.

Authors:  G Rudolph; P Kalpadakis; M Bechmann; C Haritoglou; A Kampik
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  The multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Jeffrey G Odel; Candice S Chen; Bryan J Winn
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Multifocal ERG recording with simultaneous fundus monitoring using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  C M Poloschek; V Rupp; H Krastel; F G Holz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Multifocal electroretinography in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  M Seeliger; U Kretschmann; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; K Rüther; E Zrenner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  [Multifocal electroretinogram (MF-ERG) in diagnosis of macular changes. Example: senile macular degeneration].

Authors:  A M Palmowski; E E Sutter; M A Bearse; W Fung
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Characteristics of AMD patients with low vision receiving visual rehabilitation.

Authors:  R A Schuchard; S Naseer; K de Castro
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1999-10

9.  Comparison of different high resolution multifocal electroretinogram recordings in patients with age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  B Heinemann-Vernaleken; A M Palmowski; R Allgayer; K W Ruprecht
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Voluntary suppression of the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Tamara R Vrabec; Elizabeth L Affel; John P Gaughan; Rod Foroozan; Matthew T S Tennant; James M Klancnik; Christopher S Jordan; Peter J Savino
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  6 in total

1.  Fundus motion during mfERG testing.

Authors:  Jennyffer D Smith; Allison Jussel; Rachel Wang; Daniel R Coates; Wendy W Harrison
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Fixation stability and implication for multifocal electroretinography in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration after anti-VEGF treatment.

Authors:  K B Pedersen; A K Sjølie; A H Vestergaard; S Andréasson; F Møller
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Clinical usefulness of binocular multifocal electroretinography in patients with monocular macular disease.

Authors:  Jee Wook Kim; Youn Joo Choi; Seung Yup Lee; Kyung Seek Choi
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-28

4.  Multifocal electroretinography in amblyopia.

Authors:  Christiane Al-Haddad; Alaa Bou Ghannam; Zeinab El Moussawi; Elza Rachid; Karine Ismail; Marwan Atallah; Larissa Smeets; Hasan Chahine
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Paraneoplastic neuromyelitis optica associated with ANNA-1 antibodies in invasive thymoma.

Authors:  Hee Kyung Yang; Se Joon Woo; Woong-Yang Park; Jeong-Min Hwang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  The Multifocal On- and Off-Responses in the Human Diabetic Retina.

Authors:  Jenny C Y Lung; Peter G Swann; Henry H L Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.