Literature DB >> 11518456

The impact of fixation on the multifocal electroretinogram.

J A Chisholm1, D Keating, S Parks, A L Evans.   

Abstract

There are a number of variables which can influence the quality of multifocal ERG waveforms. In common with visual field measurements, fixation quality may be an important parameter on the integrity of the acquired data. A low cost, fixation-monitoring device was used to assess fixation quality on a group of normal volunteers. Data was successfully acquired while five subjects viewed a fixation target for a period of time equal to that of a single multifocal recording segment. The target was presented on a stationary grey background and as the central fixation mark on a 61-element multifocal flicker stimulus. The results show no significant difference with or without the flickering pattern. The percentage of samples falling within 1.2 degrees of the point of fixation was 51%. This suggests that fixation quality is adequate for scaled stimuli where the central element subtends 2.4 degrees. High resolution stimuli of less than 2.4 degrees may be more susceptible to fixation fluctuations during the recording process.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11518456     DOI: 10.1023/a:1017536625847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  11 in total

1.  Continuous monitoring of the stimulated area in multifocal ERG.

Authors: 
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.

Authors:  D Keating; S Parks; A Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The field topography of ERG components in man--I. The photopic luminance response.

Authors:  E E Sutter; D Tran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Multifocal electroretinography in patients with Stargardt's macular dystrophy.

Authors:  U Kretschmann; M W Seeliger; K Ruether; T Usui; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; E Zrenner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Imaging localized retinal dysfunction with the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  M A Bearse; E E Sutter
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Mapping of retinal function in diabetic retinopathy using the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Palmowski; E E Sutter; M A Bearse; W Fung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Stability of oculomotor fixation as a function of target contrast and blur.

Authors:  M T Ukwade; H E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique.

Authors:  D C Hood; K Holopigian; V Greenstein; W Seiple; J Li; E E Sutter; R E Carr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Recording multifocal electroretinograms with fundus monitoring.

Authors:  M Kondo; Y Miyake; M Horiguchi; S Suzuki; A Tanikawa
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  5 in total

1.  Potential diagnostic dilemmas using the multifocal electroretinogram in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  C Bellmann; M M Neveu; L Kousoulides; J J Sloper; A C Bird; G E Holder
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Effects of unsteady fixation on multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG).

Authors:  Patrick H W Chu; Henry H L Chan; Susan J Leat
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Fundus motion during mfERG testing.

Authors:  Jennyffer D Smith; Allison Jussel; Rachel Wang; Daniel R Coates; Wendy W Harrison
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Fixation stability and implication for multifocal electroretinography in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration after anti-VEGF treatment.

Authors:  K B Pedersen; A K Sjølie; A H Vestergaard; S Andréasson; F Møller
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Clinical usefulness of binocular multifocal electroretinography in patients with monocular macular disease.

Authors:  Jee Wook Kim; Youn Joo Choi; Seung Yup Lee; Kyung Seek Choi
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.