Literature DB >> 9474387

Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique.

D C Hood1, K Holopigian, V Greenstein, W Seiple, J Li, E E Sutter, R E Carr.   

Abstract

To assess local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), multi-focal ERGs and local thresholds (static visual fields) were obtained on eight RP patients with visual acuities of 20/25 or better. All eight patients showed multi-focal responses with normal timing within the central 5 deg. However, there were few responses with normal timing in the areas outside the central 7.5 deg, except in the case of the only patient with a 30 Hz full-field response with normal timing. Since full-field ERGs are dominated by responses from the periphery, this finding supplies a foundation for the commonly observed delays in the full-field cone ERGs of patients with RP. With respect to amplitude, only two patients showed multi-focal responses with near normal amplitudes anywhere in the field. The loss of amplitude at any point was not a good predictor of visual sensitivity in the Humphrey visual field. On the other hand, all areas with normal timing had near normal sensitivity. Timing changes appear to be an early indication of local retinal damage to the cone system. Nearly all areas with sensitivity losses greater than 0.5 log unit, and some areas with near normal sensitivity, showed significantly delayed multi-focal ERGs. Finally areas with extreme sensitivity loss show multi-focal responses with a wide range of amplitudes and implicit times across patients, suggesting different mechanisms of disease action in different patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474387     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00143-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  36 in total

1.  Impact of notch filter use on waveforms of First- and Second-Order-Kernel responses from multifocal ERGs.

Authors:  M Bock; C Gerth; B Lorenz
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Continuous monitoring of the stimulated area in multifocal ERG.

Authors: 
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes.

Authors:  D C Hood; X Zhang
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.

Authors:  D Keating; S Parks; A Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography.

Authors:  U Kretschmann; M Bock; R Gockeln; E Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Assessment of local cone on- and off-pathway function using multifocal ERG technique.

Authors:  M Kondo; Y Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The wide field multifocal electroretinogram reveals retinal dysfunction in early retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  F M Dolan; S Parks; H Hammer; D Keating
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  The impact of fixation on the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  J A Chisholm; D Keating; S Parks; A L Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Topography of the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  W A Verdon; G Haegerstrom-Portnoy
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Comparison of mfERG waveform components and implicit time measurement techniques for detecting functional change in early diabetic eye disease.

Authors:  Marilyn E Schneck; Marcus A Bearse; Ying Han; Shirin Barez; Carl Jacobsen; Anthony J Adams
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.