Literature DB >> 7509275

The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field.

H A Baseler1, E E Sutter, S A Klein, T Carney.   

Abstract

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to luminance and pattern reversal stimulation were derived for a large number of small areas throughout the central visual field. In one study, the field was tested with a stimulus array consisting of 64 equal-area patches. Local response components were extracted by independent m-sequence modulation of the patches. Field topographies were compared between and within subjects using different electrode placements. The subject-dependent local variability observed in response characteristics is attributed to contributions from two or more cortical representations of the visual field and to inter-subject variations in gross cortical anatomy. The second study used luminance modulation of 56 patches across a 15 degrees field, scaled to activate approximately equal cortical areas in area V1. This produced many robust signals at all eccentricities. Bipolar and double differential ("1-dimensional Laplacian") signals were compared. The double differencing reduced contributions from distant or distributed sources, enhancing nearby current source activity, and greatly improved S/N for many stimulus locations. The high-resolution visual field maps demonstrated that clinical field testing using the VEP is not feasible because of effects of cortical convolutions on responses. However, the vast improvement in data quality and quantity make it a useful tool for VEP source localization and identification.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7509275     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90114-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  95 in total

1.  Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes.

Authors:  D C Hood; X Zhang
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.

Authors:  D Keating; S Parks; A Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography.

Authors:  U Kretschmann; M Bock; R Gockeln; E Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Topography of the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  W A Verdon; G Haegerstrom-Portnoy
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Topography of the chromatic pattern-onset VEP.

Authors:  Christina Gerth; Peter B Delahunt; Michael A Crognale; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Jenny E Hong; Candice S Chen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Candice S Chen; Jenny E Hong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Multifocal VEP in children: its maturation and clinical application.

Authors:  C Balachandran; A I Klistorner; F Billson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Isolating early cortical generators of visual-evoked activity: a systems identification approach.

Authors:  Jeremy W Murphy; Simon P Kelly; John J Foxe; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.