Literature DB >> 12539858

Spectral characteristics of light sources for S-cone stimulation.

F Schlegelmilch1, R Nolte, K Schellhorn, P Husar, G Henning, R P Tornow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Electrophysiological investigations of the short-wavelength sensitive pathway of the human eye require the use of a suitable light source as a S-cone stimulator. Different light sources with their spectral distribution properties were investigated and compared with the ideal S-cone stimulator.
METHODS: First, the theoretical background of the calculation of relative cone energy absorption from the spectral distribution function of the light source is summarized. From the results of the calculation, the photometric properties of the ideal S-cone stimulator will be derived. The calculation procedure was applied to virtual light sources (computer generated spectral distribution functions with different medium wavelengths and spectrum widths) and to real light sources (blue and green light emitting diodes, blue phosphor of CRT-monitor, multimedia projector, LCD monitor and notebook display). The calculated relative cone absorbencies are compared to the conditions of an ideal S-cone stimulator.
RESULTS: Monochromatic light sources with wavelengths of less than 456 nm are close to the conditions of an ideal S-cone stimulator. Spectrum widths up to 21 nm do not affect the S-cone activation significantly (S-cone activation change < 0.2%). Blue light emitting diodes with peak wavelength at 448 nm and spectrum bandwidth of 25 nm are very useful for S-cone stimulation (S-cone activation approximately 95%). A suitable display for S-cone stimulation is the Trinitron computer monitor (S-cone activation approximately 87%). The multimedia projector has a S-cone activation up to 91%, but their spectral distribution properties depends on the selected intensity. LCD monitor and notebook displays have a lower S-cone activation (< or = 74%).
CONCLUSION: Carefully selecting the blue light source for S-cone stimulation can reduce the unwanted L-and M-cone activation down to 4% for M-cones and 1.5% for L-cones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12539858     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021271603178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  17 in total

1.  Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.

Authors:  D Keating; S Parks; A Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The s-cone PHNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  N Drasdo; Y H Aldebasi; Z Chiti; K E Mortlock; J E Morgan; R V North
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Raster-scan cathode-ray tubes for vision research--limits of resolution in space, time and intensity, and some solutions.

Authors:  M Bach; T Meigen; H Strasburger
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Electroretinographic responses of the short-wavelength-sensitive cones.

Authors:  P Gouras; C J MacKay
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Pattern electroretinogram of the blue cones.

Authors:  G Niepel; E Dodt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Clinical electroretinography for short wavelength sensitive cones.

Authors:  M Sawusch; J Pokorny; V C Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Human and macaque blue cones studied with electroretinography.

Authors:  D V Norren; P Padmos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Acquired dyschromatopsias.

Authors:  W M Hart
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.

Authors:  P A Sample; C F Bosworth; E Z Blumenthal; C Girkin; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  Newer visual function tests in the evaluation of glaucoma.

Authors:  W C Stewart; B C Chauhan
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.