Literature DB >> 15675201

The effects of pupil size on the multifocal electroretinogram.

P Gonzalez1, S Parks, F Dolan, D Keating.   

Abstract

This is an investigation of the effect of changing the pupil diameter on the P1 amplitude and latency of the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). MfERGs were recorded using a custom built wide field electrophysiological system. An array of 61 empirically scaled hexagons was used to stimulate the visual field. The duration of overall recording period was 8 min, segmented into 16 intervals each lasting 30 s. A combination of mydriatics and miotics were used to pharmacologically alter the pupil size and diameters between 1 and 10 mm were measured. There was a reduction in mfERG P1 amplitude in some cases greater than 50% (mfERG P1 amplitude 53 nV at 8 mm to 25 nV at 1 mm), with a change in pupil diameter of 7 mm. The mfERG P1 latency increased in some cases by as much as 8 ms in the central 40 degrees (mfERG P1 latency 39 ms at 8 mm to 47 ms at 1 mm). These results suggest that pupil size has significant effects on mfERG P1 amplitude and latency.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15675201     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-004-1545-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  8 in total

1.  Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.

Authors:  D Keating; S Parks; A Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Factors affecting pupil size after dilatation: the Twin Eye Study.

Authors:  C J Hammond; H Snieder; T D Spector; C E Gilbert
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG).

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Donald C Hood; David Keating; Mineo Kondo; Mathias W Seeliger; Yozo Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Effect of pupil size on multifocal pattern visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Alessandra Martins; Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I Klistorner; Stuart L Graham; Francis A Billson
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  The field topography of ERG components in man--I. The photopic luminance response.

Authors:  E E Sutter; D Tran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Light adaptation of primate cones: an analysis based on extracellular data.

Authors:  J M Valeton; D van Norren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A basic investigation of multifocal electroretinogram: reproducibility and effect of luminance.

Authors:  M Yoshii; K Yanashima; T Wakaguri; F Sakemi; Y Kikuchi; S Suzuki; S Okisaka
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 8.  Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique.

Authors:  D C Hood
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 21.198

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of non-dilating the eye on full-field electroretinogram and standard flash response.

Authors:  A-M Gagné; J Lavoie; M-P Lavoie; A Sasseville; M-C Charron; M Hébert
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  Essentials of photometry for clinical electrophysiology of vision.

Authors:  Daphne L McCulloch; Ruth Hamilton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Short-term delay in neural response with multifocal contact lens might start at the retinal level.

Authors:  Paulo Fernandes; Cesarina Ferreira; Joana Domingues; Ana Amorim-de-Sousa; Miguel Faria-Ribeiro; António Queirós; José M González-Meijome
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Can we do without mydriasis in multifocal ERG recordings?

Authors:  Charlotte M Poloschek; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Foveal amplitudes of multifocal electroretinograms are larger following full-field electroretinograms.

Authors:  Wendy Harrison; Kaila Osmotherly; Nathan Biancardi; Jamison Langston; Russell Gray; Taylor Kneip; Reese Loveless
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Reproducibility of the mfERG between instruments.

Authors:  Wendy W Harrison; Marcus A Bearse; Jason S Ng; Shirin Barez; Marilyn E Schneck; Anthony J Adams
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.