Literature DB >> 11082864

Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)

D M Jones1, S Tremblay.   

Abstract

The approach to the irrelevant sound effect by Neath (2000) is discussed in terms of the contrast between content-based and process-based interference. Four themes are highlighted: First, problematic features of the feature model are highlighted; second, results not considered by Neath are presented; third, empirical underpinnings of the feature model not related to the irrelevant-sound effect are questioned; last, the parsimony of the feature model is questioned. The balance of the evidence seems to be in favor of a process-based approach, on the grounds that it provides a comprehensive account of acoustic and task-based factors within the irrelevant sound effect, for both speech and nonspeech sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11082864     DOI: 10.3758/bf03214370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  31 in total

1.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage.

Authors:  Clive Frankish
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech.

Authors:  D C Lecompte
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

4.  Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.

Authors:  C P Beaman; D M Jones
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1998-08

5.  Stimulus suffixes and visual presentation.

Authors:  R L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-11

6.  Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect.

Authors:  J Morton; R G Crowder; H A Prussin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-11

7.  Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing.

Authors:  D M Jones; W J Macken
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-03

8.  Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory.

Authors:  A M Longoni; J T Richardson; A Aiello
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01

9.  Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall.

Authors:  D C LeCompte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Effects of irrelevant sounds on phonological coding in reading comprehension and short-term memory.

Authors:  R Boyle; V Coltheart
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1996-05
View more
  25 in total

1.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 2.  The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory.

Authors:  M Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

3.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

4.  Decomposing the role of rehearsal in auditory distraction during serial recall.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; Corey I McGill; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2020-11-10

5.  Coherence of the irrelevant-sound effect: individual profiles of short-term memory and susceptibility to task-irrelevant materials.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

6.  Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura; Bettina Mehl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

7.  Articulatory suppression and the irrelevant-speech effect in short-term memory: does the locus of suppression matter?

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Anthony Pisegna
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

8.  Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Bettina Mehl; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

9.  Irrelevant speech effects and sequence learning.

Authors:  Lisa A Farley; Ian Neath; David W Allbritton; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

10.  Neural organization of linguistic short-term memory is sensory modality-dependent: evidence from signed and spoken language.

Authors:  Judy Pa; Stephen M Wilson; Herbert Pickell; Ursula Bellugi; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.