Literature DB >> 16082821

Articulatory suppression and the irrelevant-speech effect in short-term memory: does the locus of suppression matter?

Thomas C Toppino1, Anthony Pisegna.   

Abstract

Immediate serial recall for letter sequences was impaired when irrelevant speech (IS) was presented throughout stimulus input and a subsequent rehearsal interval. This irrelevant-speech effect was eliminated when participants engaged in articulatory suppression (repeated articulation of one or more digits) during stimulus input but not when suppression occurred during the postinput rehearsal period. Also, changing-state suppression (articulation of multiple items) impaired the overall level of performance more than did steady-state suppression (repetition of a single item), whereas both forms of suppression had the same influence on the IS effect. Our results suggest that the locus of suppression (during or after stimulus input) may have contributed to discrepant findings in the prior literature regarding the influence of articulatory suppression on the IS effect. We consider the implications of our findings for three prominent models of immediate memory: the working memory model, the object-oriented episodic record model, and the feature model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082821     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Authors:  I Neath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 4.  The irrelevant sound effect: what needs modelling, and a tentative model.

Authors:  M P A Page; D G Norris
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-11

5.  Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression.

Authors:  Ian Neath; Lisa A Farley; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-11

6.  Reification of phonological storage.

Authors:  William J Macken; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-11

7.  Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.

Authors:  D Jones; C Madden; C Miles
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-05

Review 8.  A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

9.  Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect?

Authors:  J R Hanley
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1997-05

10.  Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?

Authors:  Janet D Larsen; Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating models of working memory through the effects of concurrent irrelevant information.

Authors:  Jason M Chein; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.