Literature DB >> 24203721

An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech.

D C Lecompte1.   

Abstract

The irrelevant speech effect is the impairment of task performance by the presentation of to-be-ignored speech stimuli. Typically, the irrelevant speech comprises a variety of sounds, but previous research (e.g., Jones, Madden, & Miles, 1992) has suggested that the deleterious effect of background speech is virtually eliminated if the speech comprises repetitions of a sound (e.g., "be, be, be") or a single continuous sound (e.g., "beeeeeee"). Four experiments are reported that challenge this finding. Experiments 1, 2, and 4 show a substantial impairment in serial recall performance in the presence of a repeated sound, and Experiments 3 and 4 show a similar impairment of serial recall in the presence of a continuous sound. The relevance of these findings to several explanations of the irrelevant speech effect is discussed.

Year:  1995        PMID: 24203721     DOI: 10.3758/BF03210978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.

Authors:  D Jones; C Madden; C Miles
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-05

2.  Habituation to irrelevant speech: effects on a visual short-term memory task.

Authors:  N Morris; D M Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-03

3.  Modality and suffix effects in memory for melodic and harmonic musical materials.

Authors:  L A Roberts
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect.

Authors:  J Morton; R G Crowder; H A Prussin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-11

5.  Adapting to an irrelevant item in an immediate recall task.

Authors:  M J Watkins; E S Sechler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-11

6.  Similarity as an organising principle in short-term memory.

Authors:  D C LeCompte; M J Watkins
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1993-03

7.  Grouping in primary memory: the case of the compound suffix.

Authors:  D C LeCompte; M J Watkins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall.

Authors:  D C LeCompte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Suffix effects and probe modality in probed recall: implications for readout from sensory memory.

Authors:  C G Penney
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1982-05
View more
  12 in total

1.  The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

Review 2.  Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)

Authors:  D M Jones; S Tremblay
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Authors:  I Neath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

4.  The sandwich effect reassessed: effects of streaming, distraction, and modality.

Authors:  Alastair P Nicholls; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

5.  Elimination of the word length effect by irrelevant sound revisited.

Authors:  S Tremblay; W J Macken; D M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

6.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

7.  Disruption by speech of serial short-term memory: the role of changing-state vowels.

Authors:  Robert W Hughes; Sébastien Tremblay; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

8.  Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect.

Authors:  I Neath; A M Surprenant; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-03

9.  Evaluating models of working memory through the effects of concurrent irrelevant information.

Authors:  Jason M Chein; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-02

10.  What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.