Literature DB >> 17533889

Irrelevant speech effects and sequence learning.

Lisa A Farley1, Ian Neath, David W Allbritton, Aimée M Surprenant.   

Abstract

The irrelevant speech effect is the finding that performance on serial recall tasks is impaired by the presence of irrelevant background speech. According to the object-oriented episodic record (O-OER) model, this impairment is due to a conflict of order information from two different sources: the seriation of the irrelevant speech and the rehearsal of the order of the to-be-remembered items. We tested the model's prediction that irrelevant speech should impair performance on other tasks that involve seriation. Experiments 1 and 2 verified that both an irrelevant speech effect and a changing state effect would obtain in a between-subjects design in which a standard serial recall measure was used, allowing employment of a between-subjects design in subsequent experiments. Experiment 3 showed that performance on a sequence-learning task was impaired by the presence of irrelevant speech, and Experiment 4 verified that performance is worse when the irrelevant speech changes more (the changing state effect). These findings support the prediction made by the O-OER model that one essential component to the irrelevant speech effect is serial order information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17533889     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Role of study strategy in recall of mixed lists of common and rare words.

Authors:  M J Watkins; D C LeCompte; K Kim
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

4.  Interference from degraded auditory stimuli: linear effects of changing-state in the irrelevant sequence.

Authors:  D M Jones; D Alford; W J Macken; S P Banbury; S Tremblay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  A review of the effects of noise on human performance.

Authors:  A Smith
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1989

6.  Noise annoyance during the performance of different nonauditory tasks.

Authors:  A Kjellberg; B Sköldström
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1991-08

7.  Is level irrelevant in "irrelevant speech"? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking.

Authors:  W Ellermeier; J Hellbruck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

9.  On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  D C LeCompte; D M Shaibe
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1997-02

10.  The unattended speech effect: perception or memory?

Authors:  A Baddeley; P Salamé
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  6 in total

1.  Backward recall and benchmark effects of working memory.

Authors:  Tamra J Bireta; Sheena E Fry; Annie Jalbert; Ian Neath; Aimée M Surprenant; Gerald Tehan; Georgina Anne Tolan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

2.  Slave systems in verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  David Caplan; Gloria Waters; David Howard
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  The Hebb repetition effect in complex span tasks: Evidence for a shared learning mechanism with simple span tasks.

Authors:  Claudia Araya; Klaus Oberauer; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-12-06

4.  Acoustic masking disrupts time-dependent mechanisms of memory encoding in word-list recall.

Authors:  Katheryn A Q Cousins; Hayim Dar; Arthur Wingfield; Paul Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

5.  The influence of articulatory suppression on the control of implicit sequence knowledge.

Authors:  Vinciane Gaillard; Arnaud Destrebecqz; Axel Cleeremans
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Impact of Indoor Physical Environment on Learning Efficiency in Different Types of Tasks: A 3 × 4 × 3 Full Factorial Design Analysis.

Authors:  Lilin Xiong; Xiao Huang; Jie Li; Peng Mao; Xiang Wang; Rubing Wang; Meng Tang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.