Literature DB >> 11051496

Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

M E Ravicz1, J R Melcher, N Y Kiang.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) enables sites of brain activation to be localized in human subjects. For studies of the auditory system, acoustic noise generated during fMRI can interfere with assessments of this activation by introducing uncontrolled extraneous sounds. As a first step toward reducing the noise during fMRI, this paper describes the temporal and spectral characteristics of the noise present under typical fMRI study conditions for two imagers with different static magnetic field strengths. Peak noise levels were 123 and 138 dB re 20 microPa in a 1.5-tesla (T) and a 3-T imager, respectively. The noise spectrum (calculated over a 10-ms window coinciding with the highest-amplitude noise) showed a prominent maximum at 1 kHz for the 1.5-T imager (115 dB SPL) and at 1.4 kHz for the 3-T imager (131 dB SPL). The frequency content and timing of the most intense noise components indicated that the noise was primarily attributable to the readout gradients in the imaging pulse sequence. The noise persisted above background levels for 300-500 ms after gradient activity ceased, indicating that resonating structures in the imager or noise reverberating in the imager room were also factors. The gradient noise waveform was highly repeatable. In addition, the coolant pump for the imager's permanent magnet and the room air-handling system were sources of ongoing noise lower in both level and frequency than gradient coil noise. Knowledge of the sources and characteristics of the noise enabled the examination of general approaches to noise control that could be applied to reduce the unwanted noise during fMRI sessions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11051496      PMCID: PMC2270941          DOI: 10.1121/1.1310190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Analytic approach to the design of transverse gradient coils with co-axial return paths.

Authors:  R Bowtell; A Peters
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise.

Authors:  T M Talavage; W B Edmister; P J Ledden; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions.

Authors:  W B Edmister; T M Talavage; P J Ledden; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; J Van Kylen; R M Birn; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  A new silent magnetic resonance imaging using a rotating DC gradient.

Authors:  Z H Cho; S T Chung; J Y Chung; S H Park; J S Kim; C H Moon; I K Hong
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Cortical activation response to acoustic echo planar scanner noise.

Authors:  J L Ulmer; B B Biswal; F Z Yetkin; L P Mark; V P Mathews; R W Prost; L D Estkowski; T L McAuliffe; V M Haughton; D L Daniels
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality-dependent.

Authors:  P W Woodruff; R R Benson; P A Bandettini; K K Kwong; R J Howard; T Talavage; J Belliveau; B R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-08-12       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers.

Authors:  R A Hedeen; W A Edelstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Analysis of acoustic noise in MRI.

Authors:  Z H Cho; S H Park; J H Kim; S C Chung; S T Chung; J Y Chung; C W Moon; J H Yi; C H Sin; E K Wong
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Acoustic noise levels generated during high field MR imaging.

Authors:  M J McJury
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  34 in total

1.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Piotr A Wielopolski; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Whitney B Edmister
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.

Authors:  Carrie J Scarff; Joseph C Dort; Jos J Eggermont; Bradley G Goodyear
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Question/statement judgments: an fMRI study of intonation processing.

Authors:  Colin P Doherty; W Caroline West; Laura C Dilley; Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel; David Caplan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Extraction of overt verbal response from the acoustic noise in a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan by use of segmented active noise cancellation.

Authors:  Kwan-Jin Jung; Parikshit Prasad; Yulin Qin; John R Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Effects of sound bandwidth on fMRI activation in human auditory brainstem nuclei.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; Jennifer R Melcher; Barbara C Fullerton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cortical FMRI activation to sequences of tones alternating in frequency: relationship to perceived rate and streaming.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Jennifer R Melcher; Christophe Micheyl; Alexander Gutschalk; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  In situ active control of noise in a 4 T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Mingfeng Li; Brent Rudd; Teik C Lim; Jing-Huei Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.