Literature DB >> 9448773

Cortical activation response to acoustic echo planar scanner noise.

J L Ulmer1, B B Biswal, F Z Yetkin, L P Mark, V P Mathews, R W Prost, L D Estkowski, T L McAuliffe, V M Haughton, D L Daniels.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine the distribution of auditory and language cortex activation in response to acoustic echo planar scanner noise with functional MRI (fMRI).
METHOD: Acoustic scanner noise and spoken text, reproduced on high output cassette tape, were separately delivered at equivalent intensities to six normal hearing adult volunteers through earphones during fMRI data acquisition. In nine other subjects, taped scanner noise was delivered in five successive iterations of the task to assess the consistency of cortical activation to the noise stimulus. Gyri of the auditory and language system were divided into 10 different subregions for analysis of cortical activation. The number of activated pixels and proportion of volunteers activating each cortical subregion were determined using a cross-correlation analysis.
RESULTS: Cortical activation to taped acoustic scanner noise was present within the transverse temporal gyrus (primary auditory cortex) in all subjects, but activation was highly variable between subjects in auditory association and language relevant cortex. Auditory association cortex activation was seen in the planum polari, planum temporali, and middle temporal gyrus/superior temporal sulcus regions in one-half to two-thirds of the volunteers. There was no significant difference in the distribution of cortical activation within individual subjects across five successive iterations of the scanner noise task. Listening to spoken text consistently activated primary and association auditory cortex bilaterally as well as language relevant cortex in some cases. The mean number of activated pixels was significantly greater for text listening than acoustic scanner noise in auditory association and language relevant cortical subregions (p < 0.01), although the distribution of activity was similar between the two tasks.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary investigation suggests that the complex sounds produced by the echo planar pulse sequence can activate relatively large regions of auditory and language cortex bilaterally, with the extent of activation outside the primary auditory cortex being variable between subjects. However, the distribution of activation within individual subjects was relatively constant across several iterations of the scanner noise stimulus.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9448773     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199801000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  15 in total

1.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.

Authors:  Carrie J Scarff; Joseph C Dort; Jos J Eggermont; Bradley G Goodyear
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Characterizing response to elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Temporal pattern of acoustic imaging noise asymmetrically modulates activation in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ruwan D Ranaweera; Minseok Kwon; Shuowen Hu; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The influence of gender on auditory and language cortical activation patterns: preliminary data.

Authors:  Mehmet Kocak; John L Ulmer; Bharat B Biswal; Ayse Aralasmak; David L Daniels; Leighton P Mark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Differential representation of speech sounds in the human cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; John L Ulmer; Wolfgang Gaggl
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2006-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.