Literature DB >> 9950065

Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise.

T M Talavage1, W B Edmister, P J Ledden, R M Weisskoff.   

Abstract

A clustered volume acquisition functional MRI pulse sequence was modified to assess the response to the acoustic noise of echo-planar imaging in the auditory cortex and to determine whether it is possible to obtain data which is relatively free of acoustic contamination. The spatial location and strength (percent signal change) of cortical responses to the imager noise were examined by introducing extra gradient readouts, without slice excitation, to provide acoustic stimulation immediately prior to acquisition of a cerebral volume. The duration of acoustic stimulation was controlled by varying the number of extra gradient readouts. Slice acquisitions were clustered at the end of the repetition time (TR) period to prevent a response from being induced by the volume acquisition itself ("Intra-Acquisition Response"). The cerebral volumes were acquired using a long TR in order to limit the integration of the cortical response across volume acquisitions ("Inter-Acquisition Response"). Cortical responses were observed to be largest and most significant on the medial two-thirds of Heschl's gyrus, the location of primary auditory cortex. Mean signal changes induced by the imager noise were observed to be as high as 0.95%. A 2 sec delay prior to onset of the BOLD response was empirically determined. These results demonstrate that clustered volume acquisitions may be utilized for up to 2 sec of volume acquisition without inducing an appreciable Intra-Acquisition Response and can be used, with a sufficiently long TR, to provide data which are similarly free of any Inter-Acquisition Response.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9950065      PMCID: PMC6873322     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  8 in total

1.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions.

Authors:  W B Edmister; T M Talavage; P J Ledden; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; J Van Kylen; R M Birn; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality-dependent.

Authors:  P W Woodruff; R R Benson; P A Bandettini; K K Kwong; R J Howard; T Talavage; J Belliveau; B R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-08-12       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R L Buckner; P A Bandettini; K M O'Craven; R L Savoy; S E Petersen; M E Raichle; B R Rosen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis.

Authors:  S A Counter; A Olofsson; H F Grahn; E Borg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; E C Wong; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  A Galaburda; F Sanides
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1980-04-01       Impact factor: 3.215

  8 in total
  29 in total

1.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Neural representation of a rhythm depends on its interval ratio.

Authors:  K Sakai; O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; R Takino; T Tamada; N K Iwata; M Nielsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Mismatch responses to randomized gradient switching noise as reflected by fMRI and whole-head magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Klaus Mathiak; Alexander Rapp; Tilo T J Kircher; Wolfgang Grodd; Ingo Hertrich; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Werner Lutzenberger; Hermann Ackermann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Whitney B Edmister
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Hearing without listening: functional connectivity reveals the engagement of multiple nonauditory networks during basic sound processing.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

8.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Ultrafast inverse imaging techniques for fMRI.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Kevin W K Tsai; Ying-Hua Chu; Thomas Witzel; Aapo Nummenmaa; Tommi Raij; Jyrki Ahveninen; Wen-Jui Kuo; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Functional MRI detection of hemodynamic response of repeated median nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Leo Ai; Hiroyuki Oya; Matthew Howard; Jinhu Xiong
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.