Literature DB >> 9950066

Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions.

W B Edmister1, T M Talavage, P J Ledden, R M Weisskoff.   

Abstract

The effects of the noise of echo-planar functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory cortex responses were compared for two methods of acquiring functional MR data. Responses observed with a distributed volume acquisition sequence were compared to those obtained with a clustered volume acquisition sequence. In the former case, slices from the volume were acquired at equal intervals within the repetition time, whereas the latter acquired all slices in rapid succession at the end of the imaging period. The clustered volume acquisition provides a period of quiet during which a stimulus may be presented uninterrupted and uncontaminated by the noise of echo-planar imaging. Both sequences were implemented on a General Electric Signa imager retrofitted for echo-planar imaging by Advanced NMR Systems, Inc. The sequences were used to acquire 60 images per slice of a fixed volume of cerebral cortex while subjects were presented an instrumental music stimulus in an On vs. Off paradigm. Data were acquired for both sequences using TR values of 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 sec. The clustered volume acquisition sequence was found to yield greater measures of dynamic range (percent signal change, mean statistical power per unit imaging time) across the tested range of TR values. Observations of more consistent spatial extent of responses, greater mean signal changes, and higher and more consistent values of mean t-statistic per unit imaging time demonstrate the efficacy of using a clustered volume acquisition for fMRI of auditory cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9950066      PMCID: PMC6873308     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  6 in total

1.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; J Van Kylen; R M Birn; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality-dependent.

Authors:  P W Woodruff; R R Benson; P A Bandettini; K K Kwong; R J Howard; T Talavage; J Belliveau; B R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-08-12       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R L Buckner; P A Bandettini; K M O'Craven; R L Savoy; S E Petersen; M E Raichle; B R Rosen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis.

Authors:  S A Counter; A Olofsson; H F Grahn; E Borg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; E C Wong; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

  6 in total
  118 in total

1.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation and task effects in auditory processing measured using fMRI.

Authors:  D A Hall; M P Haggard; M A Akeroyd; A Q Summerfield; A R Palmer; M R Elliott; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural representation of a rhythm depends on its interval ratio.

Authors:  K Sakai; O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; R Takino; T Tamada; N K Iwata; M Nielsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Differential activation of the visual word form area during auditory phoneme perception in youth with dyslexia.

Authors:  Lisa L Conant; Einat Liebenthal; Anjali Desai; Mark S Seidenberg; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Brain activations during conscious self-monitoring of speech production with delayed auditory feedback: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Yasuki Hashimoto; Kuniyoshi L Sakai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Whitney B Edmister
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.

Authors:  Carrie J Scarff; Joseph C Dort; Jos J Eggermont; Bradley G Goodyear
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.