Literature DB >> 14601139

Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Adriaan Moelker1, Peter M T Pattynama.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) acoustic scanner noise may negatively affect the performance of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a problem that worsens at the higher field strengths proposed to enhance fMRI. We present an overview of the current knowledge on the effects of confounding acoustic MR noise in fMRI experiments. The principles and effectiveness of various methods to reduce acoustic noise in fMRI are discussed, practical considerations are addressed and recommendations are made. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14601139      PMCID: PMC6872037          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  114 in total

1.  Silent functional magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates focal activation in rapid eye movement sleep.

Authors:  K O Lövblad; R Thomas; P M Jakob; T Scammell; C Bassetti; M Griswold; J Ives; J Matheson; R R Edelman; S Warach
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-12-10       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Principles of functional magnetic resonance imaging: application to auditory neuroscience.

Authors:  A T Cacace; T Tasciyan; J P Cousins
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: the behavior interleaved gradients technique.

Authors:  G F Eden; J E Joseph; H E Brown; C P Brown; T A Zeffiro
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Sound-level measurements and calculations of safe noise dosage during EPI at 3 T.

Authors:  J R Foster; D A Hall; A Q Summerfield; A R Palmer; R W Bowtell
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Principles of active acoustic control in gradient coil design.

Authors:  P Mansfield; B Haywood
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Anatomic MR images obtained with silent sequences.

Authors:  F Girard; V L Marcar; F Hennel; E Martin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise.

Authors:  T M Talavage; W B Edmister; P J Ledden; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  STEAM-Burst: a single-shot, multi-slice imaging sequence without rapid gradient switching.

Authors:  Y Crémillieux; C A Wheeler-Kingshott; A Briguet; S J Doran
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Distinct pathways involved in sound recognition and localization: a human fMRI study.

Authors:  P P Maeder; R A Meuli; M Adriani; A Bellmann; E Fornari; J P Thiran; A Pittet; S Clarke
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Measurement of acoustic noise during MR imaging: evaluation of six "worst-case" pulse sequences.

Authors:  F G Shellock; S M Morisoli; M Ziarati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  32 in total

1.  Sparse imaging and continuous event-related fMRI in the visual domain: a systematic comparison.

Authors:  Katharina Nebel; Philipp Stude; Holger Wiese; Bernhard Müller; Armin de Greiff; Michael Forsting; Hans-Christoph Diener; Matthias Keidel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Extraction of overt verbal response from the acoustic noise in a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan by use of segmented active noise cancellation.

Authors:  Kwan-Jin Jung; Parikshit Prasad; Yulin Qin; John R Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; E C Caparelli; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The human immunodeficiency virus reduces network capacity: acoustic noise effect.

Authors:  Dardo Tomasi; Linda Chang; Elisabeth de Castro Caparelli; Frank Telang; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Cortisol responses of healthy volunteers undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kevin D Tessner; Elaine F Walker; Karen Hochman; Stephan Hamann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Functional neuroanatomy of non-verbal semantic sound processing in humans.

Authors:  A Engelien; O Tüscher; W Hermans; N Isenberg; D Eidelberg; C Frith; E Stern; D Silbersweig
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.