Literature DB >> 15202112

The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.

Carrie J Scarff1, Joseph C Dort, Jos J Eggermont, Bradley G Goodyear.   

Abstract

Auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies are limited by the presence of noise produced by echo planar imaging (EPI). The current study quantifies the effect of MR scanner noise on psychophysical measures of the perception of loudness and on measures of tonotopy, the representation of auditory frequencies within the auditory cortex. Seven normal hearing adults were examined using tones of 5 different auditory frequencies (250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000 Hz) of equal loudness. Using an imaging protocol with peak MR scanner noise at 1,460 Hz, the perception of loudness and detectable fMRI activity in response to a 1-kHz tone was less compared to other frequencies. When the imaging protocol was changed such that peak MR scanner noise occurred at 2,080 Hz, the perception of loudness and detectable fMRI activity in response to a 2-kHz tone was less compared to other frequencies. The reduction in the measured fMRI activity for tones near scanner frequencies may be due to an inflated scanner-induced baseline at those frequencies. In addition, fMRI activity decreased with increasing frequency, possibly due to the upward spread of masking of low-frequency, high-intensity tonal stimuli or the proximity of low-frequency core and belt areas of the auditory cortex. These results demonstrate the direct effect of scanner noise and high-intensity tonal stimuli on measurements of auditory cortex tonotopy. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15202112      PMCID: PMC6871718          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  39 in total

1.  "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI.

Authors:  D A Hall; M P Haggard; M A Akeroyd; A R Palmer; A Q Summerfield; M R Elliott; E M Gurney; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Evidence for a tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex observed with auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  O Bertrand; F Perrin; J Pernier
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1991

3.  Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings.

Authors:  C Pantev; O Bertrand; C Eulitz; C Verkindt; S Hampson; G Schuierer; T Elbert
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01

4.  Determination of gradient magnetic field-induced acoustic noise associated with the use of echo planar and three-dimensional, fast spin echo techniques.

Authors:  F G Shellock; M Ziarati; D Atkinson; D Y Chen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex as detected by BOLD-FMRI.

Authors:  D Bilecen; K Scheffler; N Schmid; K Tschopp; J Seelig
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; J Van Kylen; R M Birn; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Cortical activation response to acoustic echo planar scanner noise.

Authors:  J L Ulmer; B B Biswal; F Z Yetkin; L P Mark; V P Mathews; R W Prost; L D Estkowski; T L McAuliffe; V M Haughton; D L Daniels
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Study of the human auditory cortices using a whole-head magnetometer: left vs. right hemisphere and ipsilateral vs. contralateral stimulation.

Authors:  C Pantev; B Ross; P Berg; T Elbert; B Rockstroh
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1998 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Analysis of acoustic noise in MRI.

Authors:  Z H Cho; S H Park; J H Kim; S C Chung; S T Chung; J Y Chung; C W Moon; J H Yi; C H Sin; E K Wong
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; S J Williamson; L Kaufman; C Nicholson; R Llinás
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  12 in total

1.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A real-time data acquisition and control of gradient coil noise for fMRI identification of hearing disorder in children with history of ear infection.

Authors:  Jaeseung Lee; James Holte; E Russell Ritenour
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-02

4.  Effect of sound intensity on tonotopic fMRI maps in the unanesthetized monkey.

Authors:  Kazuyo Tanji; David A Leopold; Frank Q Ye; Charles Zhu; Megan Malloy; Richard C Saunders; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Mapping the tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex with minimally salient acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Lateralization of music processing with noises in the auditory cortex: an fNIRS study.

Authors:  Hendrik Santosa; Melissa Jiyoun Hong; Keum-Shik Hong
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Revealing the mechanisms behind novel auditory stimuli discrimination: An evaluation of silent functional MRI using looping star.

Authors:  Nikou L Damestani; Owen O'Daly; Ana Beatriz Solana; Florian Wiesinger; David J Lythgoe; Simon Hill; Alfonso de Lara Rubio; Elena Makovac; Steven C R Williams; Fernando Zelaya
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.399

8.  Optimized design and analysis of sparse-sampling FMRI experiments.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Satrajit S Ghosh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Functional maps of human auditory cortex: effects of acoustic features and attention.

Authors:  David L Woods; G Christopher Stecker; Teemu Rinne; Timothy J Herron; Anthony D Cate; E William Yund; Isaac Liao; Xiaojian Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of ageing on fMRI: Correction for the confounding effects of vascular reactivity evaluated by joint fMRI and MEG in 335 adults.

Authors:  Kamen A Tsvetanov; Richard N A Henson; Lorraine K Tyler; Simon W Davis; Meredith A Shafto; Jason R Taylor; Nitin Williams; James B Rowe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.