Literature DB >> 16429234

Spontaneous basilar-membrane oscillation (SBMO) and coherent reflection.

Egbert de Boer1, Alfred L Nuttall.   

Abstract

In a previous report (in JARO) we have described a relatively high-frequency (15 kHz) spontaneous oscillation of the basilar membrane (SBMO) in a guinea pig ear; this oscillation was accompanied by a spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) at the same frequency. During the spontaneous oscillation and after it had subsided, the mechanical frequency response of the basilar membrane was measured by way of a wide-band random-noise stimulus, and it showed a number of spectral peaks, one of which having the frequency of the original oscillation. This pattern of peaks cannot be explained by assuming a single place of reflection in the cochlea. In this paper the process of 'coherent reflection' is artificially evoked in a three-dimensional model of the cochlea by imposing random place-fixed irregularities to the basilar-membrane impedance. It is shown that in the model a series of peaks arises in the frequency spectrum of the basilar-membrane response which phenomenon resembles the one found in the experimental animal. It is also shown that these peaks are actually due to superposition of the primary wave and a wave resulting from 'coherent reflection' which is reflected at the stapes. When the intensity of the acoustic stimulus signal is increased, the relative sizes of these peaks in the simulation diminish in about the same way as in the experiment. It is concluded that coherent reflection most likely is the cause of the 'extra peaks', and that this concept can also explain the observed level dependence of these peaks. The findings of this study lead to a minor refinement regarding the actual requirements for coherent reflection to arise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16429234      PMCID: PMC2504585          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-005-0020-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  15 in total

1.  The "inverse problem" solved for a three-dimensional model of the cochlea. III. Brushing-up the solution method.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; P Piskorski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

9.  Dimensions of the cochlear stereocilia in man and the guinea pig.

Authors:  A Wright
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin; R Probst; A C Coats
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  6 in total

1.  Physics underlying the physiology of the ear.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Inverted direction of wave propagation (IDWP) in the cochlea.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Jiefu Zheng; Edward Porsov; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Inverse-solution method for a class of non-classical cochlear models.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Basilar-membrane interference patterns from multiple internal reflection of cochlear traveling waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Coda of the Transient Response in a Sensitive Cochlea: A Computational Modeling Study.

Authors:  Yizeng Li; Karl Grosh
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.