Literature DB >> 15675000

Do forward- and backward-traveling waves occur within the cochlea? Countering the critique of Nobili et al.

Christopher A Shera1, Arnold Tubis, Carrick L Talmadge.   

Abstract

The question of whether or not forward- and backward-traveling waves occur within the cochlea constitutes a long-standing controversy in cochlear mechanics recently brought to the fore by the problem of understanding otoacoustic emissions. Nobili and colleagues articulate the opposition to the traveling-wave viewpoint by arguing that wave-equation formulations of cochlear mechanics fundamentally misrepresent the hydrodynamics of the cochlea [e.g., Nobili et al. (2003) J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4:478-494]. To correct the perceived deficiencies of the wave-equation formulation, Nobili et al. advocate an apparently altogether different approach to cochlear modeling--the so-called "hydrodynamic" or "Green's function" approach--in which cochlear responses are represented not as forward- and backward-traveling waves but as weighted sums of the motions of individual basilar membrane oscillators, each interacting with the others via forces communicated instantaneously through the cochlear fluids. In this article, we examine Nobili and colleagues' arguments and conclusions while attempting to clarify the broader issues at stake. We demonstrate that the one-dimensional wave-equation formulation of cochlear hydrodynamics does not misrepresent long-range fluid coupling in the cochlea, as claimed. Indeed, we show that the long-range component of Nobili et al.'s three-dimensional force propagator is identical to the hydrodynamic Green's function representing a one-dimensional tapered transmission line. Furthermore, simulations that Nobili et al. use to discredit wave-equation formulations of cochlear mechanics (i.e., cochlear responses to excitation at a point along the basilar membrane) are readily reproduced and interpreted using a simple superposition of forward- and backward-traveling waves. Nobili and coworkers' critique of wave-equation formulations of cochlear mechanics thus appears to be without compelling foundation. Although the traveling-wave and hydrodynamic formulations impose strikingly disparate conceptual and computational frameworks, the two approaches ultimately describe the same underlying physics.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15675000      PMCID: PMC2504571          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4038-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  16 in total

1.  Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reflection of retrograde waves within the cochlea and at the stapes.

Authors:  C A Shera; G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A symmetry suppresses the cochlear catastrophe.

Authors:  C A Shera; G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti.

Authors:  G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Zweig; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; P Piskorski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  How well do we understand the cochlea?

Authors:  R Nobili; F Mammano; J Ashmore
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Biophysics of the cochlea: linear approximation.

Authors:  F Mammano; R Nobili
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of perilymph viscosity on low-frequency intracochlear pressures and the cochlear input impedance of the cat.

Authors:  S Koshigoe; W K Kwok; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A critique of the critical cochlea: Hopf--a bifurcation--is better than none.

Authors:  A J Hudspeth; Frank Jülicher; Pascal Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Modelling cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Guangjian Ni; Stephen J Elliott; Mohammad Ayat; Paul D Teal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  A ratchet mechanism for amplification in low-frequency mammalian hearing.

Authors:  Tobias Reichenbach; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Inner hair cell stereocilia displacement in response to focal stimulation of the basilar membrane in the ex vivo gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Aleksandrs Zosuls; Laura C Rupprecht; David C Mountain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; James B Dewey; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; John S Oghalai; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

Review 7.  A resonance approach to cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Andrew Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The vibrating reed frequency meter: digital investigation of an early cochlear model.

Authors:  Andrew Bell; Hero P Wit
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  An elemental approach to modelling the mechanics of the cochlea.

Authors:  Stephen J Elliott; Guangjian Ni
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Waves on Reissner's membrane: a mechanism for the propagation of otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea.

Authors:  Tobias Reichenbach; Aleksandra Stefanovic; Fumiaki Nin; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 9.423

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.