Literature DB >> 9295394

Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness.

D T Blake1, S S Hsiao, K O Johnson.   

Abstract

Tactile pattern recognition depends on form and texture perception. A principal dimension of texture perception is roughness, the neural coding of which was the focus of this study. Previous studies have shown that perceived roughness is not based on neural activity in the Pacinian or cutaneous slowly adapting type II (SAII) neural responses or on mean impulse rate or temporal patterning in the cutaneous slowly adapting type I (SAI) or rapidly adapting (RA) discharge evoked by a textured surface. However, those studies found very high correlations between roughness scaling by humans and measures of spatial variation in SAI and RA firing rates. The present study used textured surfaces composed of dots of varying height (280-620 micron) and diameter (0.25-2.5 mm) in psychophysical and neurophysiological experiments. RA responses were affected least by the range of dot diameters and heights that produced the widest variation in perceived roughness, and these responses could not account for the psychophysical data. In contrast, spatial variation in SAI impulse rate was correlated closely with perceived roughness over the whole stimulus range, and a single measure of SAI spatial variation accounts for the psychophysical data in this (0.974 correlation) and two previous studies. Analyses based on the possibility that perceived roughness depends on both afferent types suggest that if the RA response plays a role in roughness perception, it is one of mild inhibition. These data reinforce the hypothesis that SAI afferents are mainly responsible for information about form and texture whereas RA afferents are mainly responsible for information about flutter, slip, and motion across the skin surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9295394      PMCID: PMC6573449     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  20 in total

1.  Responses of human mechanoreceptive afferents to embossed dot arrays scanned across fingerpad skin.

Authors:  J R Phillips; R S Johansson; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception.

Authors:  K O Johnson; S S Hsiao
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Monkey cutaneous SAI and RA responses to raised and depressed scanned patterns: effects of width, height, orientation, and a raised surround.

Authors:  D T Blake; K O Johnson; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A rotating drum stimulator for scanning embossed patterns and textures across the skin.

Authors:  K O Johnson; J R Phillips
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Perceived roughness of a grating: correlation with responses of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the monkey's fingerpad.

Authors:  K Sathian; A W Goodwin; K T John; I Darian-Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Texture perception and afferent coding distorted by cooling the human ulnar nerve.

Authors:  J R Phillips; P B Matthews
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand.

Authors:  J Ochoa; E Torebjörk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey.

Authors:  K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille-like dot patterns in the monkey.

Authors:  K O Johnson; G D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  56 in total

1.  Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.

Authors:  C J Cascio; K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Neural coding and the basic law of psychophysics.

Authors:  Kenneth O Johnson; Steven S Hsiao; Takashi Yoshioka
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.519

3.  Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; B Gibb; A K Dorsch; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The Meissner corpuscle revised: a multiafferented mechanoreceptor with nociceptor immunochemical properties.

Authors:  M Paré; R Elde; J E Mazurkiewicz; A M Smith; F L Rice
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The vibrations of texture.

Authors:  Sliman J BensmaIa; Mark Hollins
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Perceptual constancy of texture roughness in the tactile system.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshioka; James C Craig; Graham C Beck; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Surface texture can bias tactile form perception.

Authors:  Masashi Nakatani; Robert D Howe; Susumu Tachi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The tactile speed aftereffect depends on the speed of adapting motion across the skin rather than other spatiotemporal features.

Authors:  Sarah McIntyre; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effect of blocking tactile information from the fingertips on adaptation and execution of grip forces to friction at the grasping surface.

Authors:  Seda Bilaloglu; Ying Lu; Daniel Geller; John Ross Rizzo; Viswanath Aluru; Esther P Gardner; Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; T Yoshioka; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.