Literature DB >> 22131421

Perceptual constancy of texture roughness in the tactile system.

Takashi Yoshioka1, James C Craig, Graham C Beck, Steven S Hsiao.   

Abstract

Our tactual perception of roughness is independent of the manner in which we touch the surface. A brick surface feels rough no matter how slowly or how rapidly we move our fingers, despite the fluctuating sensory inputs that are transmitted to the finger. Current theories of roughness perception rely solely on inputs from the cutaneous afferents, which are highly affected by scan velocity and force. The question then is: how is roughness constancy achieved? To this end, we characterized the subject's perceived roughness in six scanning conditions. These included two modes of touch: direct touch, where the finger is in contact with the surface, and indirect touch, where the surface is scanned with a hand-held probe; and three scanning modes: active (moving the hand across a stationary surface), passive (moving the surface across a stationary hand), and pseudo-passive (subject's hand is moved by the experimenter across a stationary surface). Here, we show that roughness constancy is preserved during active but not passive scanning, indicating that the hand movement is necessary for roughness constancy in both direct and indirect touch. Roughness constancy is also preserved during pseudo-passive scanning, which stresses the importance of proprioceptive input. The results show that cutaneous input provides the signals necessary for roughness perception and that proprioceptive input resulting from hand movement-rather than a motor efference copy-is necessary to achieve roughness constancy. These findings have important implications in providing realistic sensory feedback for prosthetic-hand users.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22131421      PMCID: PMC6623827          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3907-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

Review 1.  Proprioception from a spinocerebellar perspective.

Authors:  G Bosco; R E Poppele
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert; C D Frith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.

Authors:  C J Cascio; K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Neural coding and the basic law of psychophysics.

Authors:  Kenneth O Johnson; Steven S Hsiao; Takashi Yoshioka
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; B Gibb; A K Dorsch; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural correlates for roughness choice in monkey second somatosensory cortex (SII).

Authors:  J R Pruett; R J Sinclair; H Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial- frequency discrimination.

Authors:  E Gamzu; E Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness.

Authors:  Allan M Smith; C Elaine Chapman; Mélanie Deslandes; Jean-Sébastien Langlais; Marie-Pierre Thibodeau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch.

Authors:  L Belingard; C E Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: contribution of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs.

Authors:  Julien Voisin; Yves Lamarre; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Finger pad friction and its role in grip and touch.

Authors:  Michael J Adams; Simon A Johnson; Philippe Lefèvre; Vincent Lévesque; Vincent Hayward; Thibaut André; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Speed invariance of tactile texture perception.

Authors:  Zoe M Boundy-Singer; Hannes P Saal; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Multimodal Interactions between Proprioceptive and Cutaneous Signals in Primary Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Sung Soo Kim; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Pramodsingh H Thakur; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  The biology of skin wetness perception and its implications in manual function and for reproducing complex somatosensory signals in neuroprosthetics.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; Rochelle Ackerley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Tactile texture signals in primate primary somatosensory cortex and their relation to subjective roughness intensity.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bourgeon; Alexandra Dépeault; El-Mehdi Meftah; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The tactile motion aftereffect suggests an intensive code for speed in neurons sensitive to both speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  S McIntyre; I Birznieks; R M Vickery; A O Holcombe; T Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Texture-induced vibrations in the forearm during tactile exploration.

Authors:  Benoit Delhaye; Vincent Hayward; Philippe Lefèvre; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants.

Authors:  Lara A Koijck; Alexander Toet; Jan B F Van Erp
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Motor commands induce time compression for tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Monica Gori; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Human skin wetness perception: psychophysical and neurophysiological bases.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; George Havenith
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2015-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.