Literature DB >> 11438604

Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.

C J Cascio1, K Sathian.   

Abstract

Optimal perception of surface roughness requires lateral movement between skin and surface, suggesting the importance of temporal cues. The roughness of periodic gratings is affected by changing either inter-element spacing (groove width, G) or element width (ridge width, R). Peripheral neural responses to gratings depend quantitatively on a spatial variable, G, and a temporal variable, grating temporal frequency (F(t)), with changes in R acting indirectly through concomitant changes in F(t). We investigated, psychophysically, the contribution of temporal cues to human tactile perception of roughness, using gratings varying in either R or G. Gratings were scanned across the immobile fingerpad with controlled movement speed (S) and contact force. In one experiment, we found that roughness magnitude estimates depended on both G and F(t). In a second experiment, discrimination of the roughness of gratings varying in either R or G was affected by manipulating F(t). Overall, the effect of G on roughness judgments was much stronger than that of F(t), probably explaining why many previous studies using surfaces that varied only in inter-element spacing led to the conclusion that temporal factors play no role in roughness perception. However, the perceived roughness of R-varying gratings was determined by F(t) and not spatial variables. Roughness judgments were influenced by G and F(t) in a manner entirely consistent with predicted afferent response rates. Thus perceived roughness, like peripheral afferent responses, depends in part on temporal variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11438604      PMCID: PMC6762845     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  35 in total

1.  Periodicity and firing rate as candidate neural codes for the frequency of vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  E Salinas; A Hernandez; A Zainos; R Romo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neuronal activity in the primary somatosensory cortex in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during active touch of textured surface gratings: responses to groove width, applied force, and velocity of motion.

Authors:  R J Sinclair; H Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Structure of receptive fields in area 3b of primary somatosensory cortex in the alert monkey.

Authors:  J J DiCarlo; K O Johnson; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spatial and temporal factors determining afferent fiber responses to a grating moving sinusoidally over the monkey's fingerpad.

Authors:  A W Goodwin; K T John; K Sathian; I Darian-Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Perceived roughness of a grating: correlation with responses of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the monkey's fingerpad.

Authors:  K Sathian; A W Goodwin; K T John; I Darian-Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: representation of grating and movement features in afferent fiber responses.

Authors:  A W Goodwin; J W Morley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey's finger pad.

Authors:  I Darian-Smith; L E Oke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes.

Authors:  M A Srinivasan; J M Whitehouse; R H LaMotte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans.

Authors:  G D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  24 in total

1.  Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial- frequency discrimination.

Authors:  E Gamzu; E Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Tactile dominance in speeded discrimination of textures.

Authors:  Steve Guest; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The vibrations of texture.

Authors:  Sliman J BensmaIa; Mark Hollins
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.111

4.  Perceptual constancy of texture roughness in the tactile system.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshioka; James C Craig; Graham C Beck; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Roughness of simulated surfaces examined with a haptic tool: effects of spatial period, friction, and resistance amplitude.

Authors:  Allan M Smith; Georges Basile; Jonathan Theriault-Groom; Pascal Fortier-Poisson; Gianni Campion; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Kinematics of unconstrained tactile texture exploration.

Authors:  Thierri Callier; Hannes P Saal; Elizabeth C Davis-Berg; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Millisecond precision spike timing shapes tactile perception.

Authors:  Emily L Mackevicius; Matthew D Best; Hannes P Saal; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Analysis of haptic information in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Tactile perception of the roughness of 3D-printed textures.

Authors:  Chelsea Tymms; Denis Zorin; Esther P Gardner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Speed invariance of tactile texture perception.

Authors:  Zoe M Boundy-Singer; Hannes P Saal; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.