Literature DB >> 1545242

Responses of human mechanoreceptive afferents to embossed dot arrays scanned across fingerpad skin.

J R Phillips1, R S Johansson, K O Johnson.   

Abstract

The spatial resolving capacities of the four classes of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating human fingerpad skin were investigated to determine which class sets the limit of tactile spatial resolution for scanning stimuli. The stimulus consisted of an array of embossed dots (0.7 mm diameter, 0.5 mm high) arranged in a tetragonal pattern with dot spacing decreasing linearly from 6.4 mm at one end of the array to 0.87 mm at the other. The pattern was wrapped around a drum and repeatedly scanned across the receptive field of single afferents by continuously rotating the drum. Responses to many closely spaced scans were obtained by imposing a lateral shift of the pattern between each revolution. Impulses were recorded microneurographically. Responses were plotted in raster form to produce a neural image of the pattern. Responses of rapidly and slowly adapting type I (FAI and SAI) afferents resolved dots down to a spacing of about 1.5 mm. Responses of type II (FAII and SAII) afferents resolved dots down to a spacing of about 3.5 mm. Variation in scanning speed (range, 20-90 mm/sec) and contact force (range, 0.4-1.0 N) had minimal effects on spatial resolution of all afferents. The response clusters associated with individual widely spaced dots were used to investigate receptive field structure. FAI and SAI fields (mean areas, 6.1 and 4.8 mm2, respectively) each contained several zones of maximal sensitivity. FAI fields had five to eight such zones, whereas SAI fields had three to five such zones. As dot spacing decreased, neighboring dots interacted to affect the responses associated with the individual zones within a field. Initially, one or more zones were deactivated, effectively reducing receptive field size and allowing representation of finer spatial detail than would be predicted from the overall area of the receptive field. At very close dot spacings responses were only obtained when more than one sensitive zone within a field were simultaneously activated by different dots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1545242      PMCID: PMC6576043     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  44 in total

Review 1.  Neural coding and the basic law of psychophysics.

Authors:  Kenneth O Johnson; Steven S Hsiao; Takashi Yoshioka
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; B Gibb; A K Dorsch; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modeling population responses of rapidly-adapting mechanoreceptive fibers.

Authors:  Burak Güçlü; Stanley J Bolanowski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Human touch receptors are sensitive to spatial details on the scale of single fingerprint ridges.

Authors:  Ewa Jarocka; J Andrew Pruszynski; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; T Yoshioka; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Justin H Killebrew; Sliman J Bensmaïa; John F Dammann; Peter Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

10.  Velocity invariance of receptive field structure in somatosensory cortical area 3b of the alert monkey.

Authors:  J J DiCarlo; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.