Literature DB >> 3582528

Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip.

R S Johansson, G Westling.   

Abstract

While human subjects lift small objects using the precision grip between the tips of the fingers and thumb the ratio between the grip force and the load force (i.e. the vertical lifting force) is adapted to the friction between the object and the skin. The present report provides direct evidence that signals in tactile afferent units are utilized in this adaptation. Tactile afferent units were readily excited by small but distinct slips between the object and the skin revealed as vibrations in the object. Following such afferent slip responses the force ratio was upgraded to a higher, stable value which provided a safety margin to prevent further slips. The latency between the onset of the a slip and the appearance of the ratio change (74 +/- 9 ms) was about half the minimum latency for intended grip force changes triggered by cutaneous stimulation of the fingers. This indicated that the motor responses were automatically initiated. If the subjects were asked to very slowly separate their thumb and the opposing finger while the object was held in air, grip force reflexes originating from afferent slip responses appeared to counteract the voluntary command, but the maintained upgrading of the force ratio was suppressed. In experiments with weak electrical cutaneous stimulation delivered through the surfaces of the object it was established that tactile input alone could trigger the upgrading of the force ratio. Although, varying in responsiveness, each of the three types of tactile units which exhibit a pronounced dynamic sensitivity (FA I, FA II and SA I units) could reliably signal these slips. Similar but generally weaker afferent responses, sometimes followed by small force ratio changes, also occurred in the FA I and the SA I units in the absence of detectable vibrations events. In contrast to the responses associated with clear vibratory events, the weaker afferent responses were probably caused by localized frictional slips, i.e. slips limited to small fractions of the skin area in contact with the object. Indications were found that the early adjustment to a new frictional condition, which may appear soon (ca. 0.1-0.2 s) after the object is initially gripped, might depend on the vigorous responses in the FA I units during the initial phase of the lifts (see Westling and Johansson 1987). The role of the tactile input in the adaptation of the force coordination to the frictional condition is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3582528     DOI: 10.1007/bf00236210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Plasticity of the human abdominal skin reflex.

Authors:  K E HAGBARTH; E KUGELBERG
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Cutaneous reflexes in small muscles of the hand.

Authors:  M R Caccia; A J McComas; A R Upton; T Blogg
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Evidence from the use of vibration that the human long-latency stretch reflex depends upon spindle secondary afferents.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Long-latency automatic responses to muscle stretch in man: origin and function.

Authors:  C D Marsden; J C Rothwell; B L Day
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1983

5.  Evidence of phase-dependent nociceptive reflexes during locomotion in man.

Authors:  P Crenna; C Frigo
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture discrimination.

Authors:  K O Johnson
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1983-06

7.  The reflex responses of single motor units in human first dorsal interosseous muscle following cutaneous afferent stimulation.

Authors:  R Garnett; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man.

Authors:  R Garnett; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Servo action in the human thumb.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  152 in total

1.  Visual and non-visual control of landing movements in humans.

Authors:  M Santello; M J McDonagh; J H Challis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Precision grip force control of older and younger adults, revisited.

Authors:  B D Lowe
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-12

3.  Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling; A Bäckström; J R Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Perceptual constancy and the perceived magnitude of muscle forces.

Authors:  Lynette A Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Tactile feedback contributes to consistency of finger movements during typing.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Loads applied tangential to a fingertip during an object restraint task can trigger short-latency as well as long-latency EMG responses in hand muscles.

Authors:  Vaughan G Macefield; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Independent control of human finger-tip forces at individual digits during precision lifting.

Authors:  B B Edin; G Westling; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Effects of carpal tunnel syndrome on adaptation of multi-digit forces to object texture.

Authors:  Mostafa Afifi; Marco Santello; Jamie A Johnston
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Grip responses to object load perturbations are stimulus and phase sensitive.

Authors:  L A Mrotek; B A Hart; P K Schot; L Fennigkoh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.