Literature DB >> 26631149

The tactile speed aftereffect depends on the speed of adapting motion across the skin rather than other spatiotemporal features.

Sarah McIntyre1, Tatjana Seizova-Cajic2, Alex O Holcombe3.   

Abstract

After prolonged exposure to a surface moving across the skin, this felt movement appears slower, a phenomenon known as the tactile speed aftereffect (tSAE). We asked which feature of the adapting motion drives the tSAE: speed, the spacing between texture elements, or the frequency with which they cross the skin. After adapting to a ridged moving surface with one hand, participants compared the speed of test stimuli on adapted and unadapted hands. We used surfaces with different spatial periods (SPs; 3, 6, 12 mm) that produced adapting motion with different combinations of adapting speed (20, 40, 80 mm/s) and temporal frequency (TF; 3.4, 6.7, 13.4 ridges/s). The primary determinant of tSAE magnitude was speed of the adapting motion, not SP or TF. This suggests that adaptation occurs centrally, after speed has been computed from SP and TF, and/or that it reflects a speed cue independent of those features in the first place (e.g., indentation force). In a second experiment, we investigated the properties of the neural code for speed. Speed tuning predicts that adaptation should be greatest for speeds at or near the adapting speed. However, the tSAE was always stronger when the adapting stimulus was faster (242 mm/s) than the test (30-143 mm/s) compared with when the adapting and test speeds were matched. These results give no indication of speed tuning and instead suggest that adaptation occurs at a level where an intensive code dominates. In an intensive code, the faster the stimulus, the more the neurons fire.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; human; motion; psychophysics; touch

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26631149      PMCID: PMC4808121          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00821.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration.

Authors:  Allan M Smith; Geneviève Gosselin; Bryan Houde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates.

Authors:  C E Connor; S S Hsiao; J R Phillips; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The role of vibration in tactile speed perception.

Authors:  Chris J Dallmann; Marc O Ernst; Alessandro Moscatelli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cortical mechanisms underlying tactile discrimination in the monkey. I. Role of primary somatosensory cortex in passive texture discrimination.

Authors:  F Tremblay; S A Ageranioti-Bélanger; C E Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: representation of grating and movement features in afferent fiber responses.

Authors:  A W Goodwin; J W Morley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey's finger pad.

Authors:  I Darian-Smith; L E Oke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Cortical information processing of stimulus motion on primate skin.

Authors:  B L Whitsel; J R Roppolo; G Werner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Simulation of motion on the skin. I. Receptive fields and temporal frequency coding by cutaneous mechanoreceptors of OPTACON pulses delivered to the hand.

Authors:  E P Gardner; C I Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: temporal patterns of afferent fiber responses.

Authors:  J W Morley; A W Goodwin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A comparison of human tactile stimulus velocity discrimination with the ability of S-I cortical neurons in awake rhesus monkeys to signal the same velocity differences before and after non-anesthetic doses of pentobarbital.

Authors:  J G Collins; J R Roppolo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-10-06       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  3 in total

1.  The tactile motion aftereffect suggests an intensive code for speed in neurons sensitive to both speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  S McIntyre; I Birznieks; R M Vickery; A O Holcombe; T Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  An Adaptation-Induced Repulsion Illusion in Tactile Spatial Perception.

Authors:  Lux Li; Arielle Chan; Shah M Iqbal; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Motion Direction Discrimination with Tactile Random-Dot Kinematograms.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-03-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.