Literature DB >> 16236779

SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings.

S J Bensmaïa1, J C Craig, T Yoshioka, K O Johnson.   

Abstract

SA1 and RA afferent fibers differ both in their ability to convey information about the fine spatial structure of tactile stimuli and in their frequency sensitivity profiles. In the present study, we investigated the extent to which the spatial resolution of the signal conveyed by SA1 and RA fibers depends on the temporal properties of the stimulus. To that end, we recorded the responses evoked in SA1 and RA fibers of macaques by static and vibrating gratings that varied in spatial period, vibratory frequency, and amplitude. Gratings were oriented either parallel to the long axis of the finger (vertical) or perpendicular to it (horizontal). We examined the degree to which afferent responses were dependent on the spatial period, vibratory frequency, amplitude, and orientation of the gratings. We found that the spatial modulation of the afferent responses increased as the spatial period of the gratings increased; the spatial modulation was the same for static and vibrating gratings, despite large differences in evoked spike rates; the spatial modulation in SA1 responses was independent of stimulus amplitude over the range of amplitudes tested, whereas RA modulation decreased slightly as the stimulus amplitude increased; vertical gratings evoked stronger and more highly modulated responses than horizontal gratings; the modulation in SA1 responses was higher than that in RA responses at all frequencies and amplitudes. The behavioral consequences of these neurophysiological findings are examined in a companion paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16236779      PMCID: PMC1839046          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00877.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  Tactile detection of a dot on a smooth surface: peripheral neural events.

Authors:  R H LaMotte; J Whitehouse
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spatial and temporal factors determining afferent fiber responses to a grating moving sinusoidally over the monkey's fingerpad.

Authors:  A W Goodwin; K T John; K Sathian; I Darian-Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: effect of contact angle and force of the grating on afferent fiber responses.

Authors:  A W Goodwin; J W Morley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: representation of grating and movement features in afferent fiber responses.

Authors:  A W Goodwin; J W Morley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch.

Authors:  S J Bolanowski; G A Gescheider; R T Verrillo; C M Checkosky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements.

Authors:  R S Johansson; U Landström; R Lundström
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: peripheral neural coding in the monkey.

Authors:  G D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model.

Authors:  A W Freeman; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings.

Authors:  J R Phillips; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: temporal patterns of afferent fiber responses.

Authors:  J W Morley; A W Goodwin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  15 in total

1.  A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Justin H Killebrew; Sliman J Bensmaïa; John F Dammann; Peter Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures.

Authors:  Alison I Weber; Hannes P Saal; Justin D Lieber; Ju-Wen Cheng; Louise R Manfredi; John F Dammann; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tactile perception of the roughness of 3D-printed textures.

Authors:  Chelsea Tymms; Denis Zorin; Esther P Gardner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A continuum mechanical model of mechanoreceptive afferent responses to indented spatial patterns.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Sliman J Bensmaia; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: an analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; S S Hsiao
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2007 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.111

7.  Tactile co-activation improves detection of afferent spatial modulation.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; Christopher D Makinson; Krish Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The neural basis of tactile motion perception.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Pei; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Discriminating smooth from grooved surfaces: effects of random variations in skin penetration.

Authors:  James C Craig; Roger P Rhodes; Gregory O Gibson; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Roughness encoding in human and biomimetic artificial touch: spatiotemporal frequency modulation and structural anisotropy of fingerprints.

Authors:  Calogero Maria Oddo; Lucia Beccai; Johan Wessberg; Helena Backlund Wasling; Fabio Mattioli; Maria Chiara Carrozza
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.