Literature DB >> 9184488

A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition.

J G Seamon1, D Ganor-Stern, M J Crowley, S M Wilson, W J Weber, C M O'Rourke, J K Mahoney.   

Abstract

If the mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory, recognition and affect judgments should be dissociated by experimental variables in the same manner as other explicit and implicit measures. Consistent with results from recognition and picture naming or object decision priming tasks (e.g., Biederman & E.E. Cooper, 1991, 1992; L.A. Cooper, Schacter, Ballesteros, & Moore, 1992), the present research showed that recognition memory but not affective preference was impaired by reflection or size transformations of three-dimensional objects between study and test. Stimulus color transformations had no effect on either measure. These results indicate that representations that support recognition memory code spatial information about an object's left-right orientation and size, whereas representations that underlie affective preference do not. Insensitivity to surface feature changes that do not alter object form appears to be a general characteristic of implicit memory measures, including the affective preference task.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9184488     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  30 in total

1.  Auditory priming: implicit and explicit memory for words and voices.

Authors:  D L Schacter; B A Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size.

Authors:  B Milliken; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-01

3.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.

Authors:  D L Schacter; L A Cooper; S M Delaney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-03

4.  The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming.

Authors:  C J Price; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1989-11

5.  Size in the visual processing of faces and words.

Authors:  P A Kolers; R L Duchnicky; G Sundstroem
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-11

7.  Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized.

Authors:  J G Seamon; R L Marsh; N Brody
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality.

Authors:  J G Seamon; N Brody; D M Kauff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests.

Authors:  M S Weldon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  12 in total

1.  Dissociating mere exposure and repetition priming as a function of word type.

Authors:  Laurie T Butler; Dianne C Berry; Shaun Helman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

2.  Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

3.  Self-generated visual imagery alters the mere exposure effect.

Authors:  Catherine Craver-Lemley; Robert F Bornstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

4.  Exposure effects on music preference and recognition.

Authors:  I Peretz; D Gaudreau; A M Bonnel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

5.  Refining the visual-cortical hypothesis in category learning.

Authors:  Mariana V C Coutinho; Justin J Couchman; Joshua S Redford; J David Smith
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  The mere exposure effect for visual image.

Authors:  Kazuya Inoue; Yoshihiko Yagi; Nobuya Sato
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

7.  A role for the perceptual representation memory system in category learning.

Authors:  Michael B Casale; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-08

8.  Mere Exposure: Preference Change for Novel Drinks Reflected in Human Ventral Tegmental Area.

Authors:  Ian C Ballard; Kelly Hennigan; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The mere exposure effect in the domain of haptics.

Authors:  Martina Jakesch; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of perceptual load in object recognition.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Zhicheng Lin; Nahid Zokaei; Volker Thoma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.