Literature DB >> 1549067

Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size.

B Milliken1, P Jolicoeur.   

Abstract

Recognition memory for shapes has been shown to depend on differences between the size of shapes at the time of encoding and at the time of the memory test (Jolicoeur, 1987). Experiment 1 of the present paper replicates this effect and establishes a set of parameters used in the subsequent experiments. Experiment 2 considers the results of Experiment 1 in light of the distinction between "perceived" size, which, under normal viewing conditions, varies minimally with changes in distance between the observer and object, and "retinal" size, which varies proportionally with viewing distance as an object is moved closer to or farther from an observer. Subjects studied novel shapes and performed a recognition memory test in which the distance from the subject to the viewing screen at the time of testing was different from that at the time of encoding. The viewing distance and the size of the shapes were manipulated such that perceived and retinal sizes were dissociated. The results suggest that the size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape occurs as a result of changes in the perceived size of shapes between the encoding and the testing phases, with little or no contribution of retinal size per se.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1549067     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  30 in total

1.  On size-perception in the absence of cues for distance.

Authors:  H WALLACH; V McKENNA
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1960-09

2.  The effect of retinal and phenomenal orientation on the perception of form.

Authors:  I ROCK; W HEIMER
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-12

3.  Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; B Milliken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Size in the visual processing of faces and words.

Authors:  P A Kolers; R L Duchnicky; G Sundstroem
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-11

6.  The perception of disoriented figures.

Authors:  I Rock
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  The sensing of retinal size.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visual pattern recognition: size preprocessing re-examined.

Authors:  D Besner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1983-02

9.  Size scaling in visual pattern recognition.

Authors:  A Larsen; C Bundesen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Chronometric analysis of classification.

Authors:  M I Posner; R F Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  7 in total

1.  Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

2.  Frequency-based heuristics for material perception.

Authors:  Martin Giesel; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Size and reflection effects in priming: a test of transfer-appropriate processing.

Authors:  K Srinivas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

4.  A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition.

Authors:  J G Seamon; D Ganor-Stern; M J Crowley; S M Wilson; W J Weber; C M O'Rourke; J K Mahoney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-05

5.  Even affective changes induced by the global health crisis are insufficient to perturb the hyper-stability of visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Chong Zhao; Keisuke Fukuda; Sohee Park; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-16

6.  Two types of representation in visual memory: evidence from the effects of stimulus contrast on image combination.

Authors:  G J Hitch; M A Brandimonte; P Walker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-03

7.  Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition.

Authors:  Matt Craddock; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.