Literature DB >> 15813498

Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects.

Rebecca Lawson1.   

Abstract

In two experiments, the identification of novel 3-D objects was worse for depth-rotated and mirror-reflected views, compared with the study view in an implicit affective preference memory task, as well as in an explicit recognition memory task. In Experiment 1, recognition was worse and preference was lower when depth-rotated views of an object were paired with an unstudied object relative to trials when the study view of that object was shown. There was a similar trend for mirror-reflected views. In Experiment 2, the study view of an object was both recognized and preferred above chance when it was paired with either depth-rotated or mirror-reflected views of that object. These results suggest that view-sensitive representations of objects mediate performance in implicit, as well as explicit, memory tasks. The findings do not support the claim that separate episodic and structural description representations underlie performance in implicit and explicit memory tasks, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15813498     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  29 in total

1.  Low reliability of perceptual priming: consequences for the interpretation of functional dissociations between explicit and implicit memory.

Authors:  B Meier; W J Perrig
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-02

2.  The influence of task requirements on priming in object decision and matching.

Authors:  T Liu; L A Cooper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

3.  Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: rethinking the mere exposure effect.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; J R Price
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

4.  Invariance of long-term visual priming to scale, reflection, translation, and hemisphere.

Authors:  J Fiser; I Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The subliminal mere exposure effect does not generalize to structurally related stimuli.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; James E H Bright
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-03

6.  The role of colour in implicit and explicit memory performance.

Authors:  David Vernon; Toby J Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-07

7.  Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size.

Authors:  B Milliken; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-01

8.  View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects.

Authors:  R Lawson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-08

9.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.

Authors:  D L Schacter; L A Cooper; S M Delaney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-03

10.  A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Cerebral asymmetries in sleep-dependent processes of memory consolidation.

Authors:  Philippe Peigneux; Remy Schmitz; Sylvie Willems
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Item to decision mapping in rapid response learning.

Authors:  David M Schnyer; Ian G Dobbins; Lindsay Nicholls; Sarah Davis; Mieke Verfaellie; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

3.  Trait and state anxiety reduce the mere exposure effect.

Authors:  Sandra L Ladd; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.