Literature DB >> 15552353

Dissociating mere exposure and repetition priming as a function of word type.

Laurie T Butler1, Dianne C Berry, Shaun Helman.   

Abstract

The mere exposure effect is defined as enhanced attitude toward a stimulus that has been repeatedly exposed. Repetition priming is defined as facilitated processing of a previously exposed stimulus. We conducted a direct comparison between the two phenomena to test the assumption that the mere exposure effect represents an example of repetition priming. In two experiments, having studied a set of words or nonwords, participants were given a repetition priming task (perceptual identification) or one of two mere exposure (affective liking or preference judgment) tasks. Repetition priming was obtained for both words and nonwords, but only nonwords produced a mere exposure effect. This demonstrates a key boundary for observing the mere exposure effect, one not readily accommodated by a perceptual representation systems (Tulving & Schacter, 1990) account, which assumes that both phenomena should show some sensitivity to nonwords and words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15552353     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  The generation effect: dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

2.  Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of size and reflection.

Authors:  L A Cooper; D L Schacter; S Ballesteros; C Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Understanding the relationship between repetition priming and mere exposure.

Authors:  Laurie T Butler; Dianne C Berry
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2004-11

4.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.

Authors:  D L Schacter; L A Cooper; S M Delaney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-03

5.  The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgment tasks.

Authors:  J G Seamon; P A McKenna; N Binder
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-03

6.  Different perceptual codes support priming for words and pseudowords: was Morton right all along?

Authors:  J S Bowers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Sublexical components in implicit memory for novel words.

Authors:  J Dorfman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality.

Authors:  J G Seamon; N Brody; D M Kauff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Verbal repetition and connotative change.

Authors:  H Amster; L D Glasman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-03

10.  Conscious recollection and the human hippocampal formation: evidence from positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Schacter; N M Alpert; C R Savage; S L Rauch; M S Albert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  Trait and state anxiety reduce the mere exposure effect.

Authors:  Sandra L Ladd; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.