Literature DB >> 20675027

Refining the visual-cortical hypothesis in category learning.

Mariana V C Coutinho1, Justin J Couchman, Joshua S Redford, J David Smith.   

Abstract

Participants produce steep typicality gradients and large prototype-enhancement effects in dot-distortion category tasks, showing that in these tasks to-be-categorized items are compared to a prototypical representation that is the central tendency of the participant's exemplar experience. These prototype-abstraction processes have been ascribed to low-level mechanisms in primary visual cortex. Here we asked whether higher-level mechanisms in visual cortex can also sometimes support prototype abstraction. To do so, we compared dot-distortion performance when the stimuli were size constant (allowing some low-level repetition-familiarity to develop for similar shapes) or size variable (defeating repetition-familiarity effects). If prototype formation is only mediated by low-level mechanisms, stimulus-size variability should lessen prototype effects and flatten typicality gradients. Yet prototype effects and typicality gradients were the same under both conditions, whether participants learned the categories explicitly or implicitly and whether they received trial-by-trial reinforcement during transfer tests. These results broaden out the visual-cortical hypothesis because low-level visual areas, featuring retinotopic perceptual representations, would not support robust category learning or prototype-enhancement effects in an environment of pronounced variability in stimulus size. Therefore, higher-level cortical mechanisms evidently can also support prototype formation during categorization. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675027      PMCID: PMC2932807          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  47 in total

1.  Complementary category learning systems identified using event-related functional MRI.

Authors:  H J Aizenstein; A W MacDonald; V A Stenger; R D Nebes; J K Larson; S Ursu; C S Carter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Comparing the brain areas supporting nondeclarative categorization and recognition memory.

Authors:  Paul J Reber; Eric C Wong; Richard B Buxton
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-08

3.  Exemplar theory's predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed.

Authors:  J David Smith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

4.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; J David Smith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-12

6.  Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns.

Authors:  M I Posner; R Goldsmith; K E Welton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-01

7.  Representation of central visual fields in prestriate cortex of monkey.

Authors:  S M Zeki
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  J David Smith; Michael J Beran; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

9.  Visual categorization and object representation in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  N Sigala; F Gabbiani; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  2 in total

1.  Perceptual fluency can be used as a cue for categorization decisions.

Authors:  Sarah J Miles; John Paul Minda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  An Eye-Tracking Study of Multiple Feature Value Category Structure Learning: The Role of Unique Features.

Authors:  Zhiya Liu; Xiaohong Song; Carol A Seger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.