Literature DB >> 7814487

Role of confirmatory PCRs in determining performance of Chlamydia Amplicor PCR with endocervical specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection.

J B Mahony1, K E Luinstra, J W Sellors, L Pickard, S Chong, D Jang, M A Chernesky.   

Abstract

The role of confirmatory PCR assays for determining the performance of Chlamydia Amplicor PCR for endocervical specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection was evaluated. An endocervical swab was collected from 770 women and tested by culture or direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) staining. A second swab was tested by Chlamydia Amplicor PCR (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.). Discordant results were resolved by three confirmatory PCRs: one targeting the plasmid by using different primers and two directed to the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) gene. Of the 30 swabs that were positive by culture or DFA (3.9%), 27 were positive by Amplicor PCR. An additional five swabs were positive by Amplicor PCR but negative by culture or DFA. Both plasmid and MOMP confirmatory PCRs identified the five culture-DFA negatives and the three Amplicor negatives as true positives. The three specimens originally classified as negative by Amplicor PCR were positive on repeat Amplicor testing. After resolution of the discordant results by confirmatory PCR testing, the sensitivity of the initial Amplicor PCR was 91.4% (32 of 35 specimens), changing to 100% after storage and repeat testing. The specificity of Amplicor PCR was 100% (735 of 735 specimens). Our results demonstrated that plasmid and MOMP confirmatory PCRs worked equally well in resolving false-positive and false-negative Amplicor PCR results. Some specimens may contain inhibitors of Amplicor PCR which may disappear with time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7814487      PMCID: PMC264089          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2490-2493.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  23 in total

1.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  H C Claas; W J Melchers; I H de Bruijn; M de Graaf; W C van Dijk; J Lindeman; W G Quint
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in swabs and urine from men with non-gonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  H M Palmer; C B Gilroy; B J Thomas; P E Hay; C Gilchrist; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Detection of C trachomatis in urogenital specimens by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  H Näher; H Drzonek; J Wolf; M von Knebel Doeberitz; D Petzoldt
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

4.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  L Bobo; F Coutlee; R H Yolken; T Quinn; R P Viscidi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Interlaboratory agreement study of a double set of PCR plasmid primers for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a variety of genitourinary specimens.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J Waner; G McNab; H Hobranzska; D Gregson; J W Sellors; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections by cell culture and the polymerase chain reaction using a closed system.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; J Traulsen; S Birkelund; G Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in patients with non-gonococcal urethritis using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  G Ratti; A Moroni; R Cevenini
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Genetic diversity and identification of human infection by amplification of the chlamydial 60-kilodalton cysteine-rich outer membrane protein gene.

Authors:  M W Watson; P R Lambden; I N Clarke
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  B Dutilh; C Bébéar; P Rodriguez; A Vekris; J Bonnet; M Garret
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.992

10.  Diagnostic value of the polymerase chain reaction for Chlamydia detection as determined in a follow-up study.

Authors:  H C Claas; J H Wagenvoort; H G Niesters; T T Tio; J H Van Rijsoort-Vos; W G Quint
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pooling cervical swabs and testing by ligase chain reaction are accurate and cost-saving strategies for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Kapala; D Copes; A Sproston; J Patel; D Jang; A Petrich; J Mahony; K Biers; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Improved sensitivity of the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor assay using an optimized procedure for preparation of specimens.

Authors:  C Niederhauser; L Kaempf
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Genital chlamydial infection among women in Nicaragua: validity of direct fluorescent antibody testing, prevalence, risk factors and clinical manifestations.

Authors:  B Herrmann; F Espinoza; R R Villegas; G D Smith; A Ramos; M Egger
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1996-02

4.  Evaluation of bias in diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity estimates computed by discrepant analysis.

Authors:  T A Green; C M Black; R E Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Use of a single swab in multi-microbe or flex trans transport medium for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by Roche Amplicor PCR and culture in specimens from two different patient populations.

Authors:  C K Fong; J Falcone; M L Landry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Lowering the cut off value of an automated chlamydia enzyme immunoassay and confirmation by PCR and direct immunofluorescent antibody test.

Authors:  C Y Tong; C Donnelly; N Hood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Evaluation of automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR system for detection of several infectious agents and its impact on laboratory management.

Authors:  D Jungkind; S Direnzo; K G Beavis; N S Silverman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.

Authors:  Anthony W Solomon; Rosanna W Peeling; Allen Foster; David C W Mabey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Reasons for testing women for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the Calgary region.

Authors:  Deirdre L Church; Ali Zentner; Heather Semeniuk; Elizabeth Henderson; Ron Read
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.