Literature DB >> 8263189

Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay.

J E Bauwens1, A M Clark, W E Stamm.   

Abstract

We evaluated a prototype polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay for Chlamydia trachomatis developed by Roche Molecular Systems to detect endocervical infection in women. Of 587 endocervical samples obtained from women attending the Harborview Medical Center sexually transmitted diseases clinic, 58 (10%) were positive for C. trachomatis by cell culture. Compared with culture, the PCR method had a sensitivity of 88% (51 of 58) and a specificity of 99.2% (525 of 529). The positive and negative predictive values were 92.7% (51 of 55) and 98.7% (525 of 532), respectively. After resolution of discrepant results whereby true positives were considered to be either culture-positive patients (58 patients) or culture-negative patients positive upon PCR analysis using both plasmid- and major outer membrane protein-based primers (4 patients), the resolved sensitivities of the PCR and culture were 89 and 93%, respectively. We subsequently performed a second analysis of 362 women, comparing the proposed commercial PCR assay from Roche Molecular Systems with chlamydia cultures. Thirty (8%) women were infected with C. trachomatis. Compared with culture, the assay had a sensitivity of 60% (18 of 30) and a specificity of 99% (328 of 332). Repeat PCR assay done 2 to 5 days later subsequently yielded positive results for 7 of 11 PCR-negative samples from culture-positive women. We conclude that the Roche Molecular Systems PCR assay provides highly specific results compared with culture in a high-risk population of women. Further study is needed, however, to more clearly define the sensitivity of the PCR assay in detecting endocervical C. trachomatis infection in women and to identify factors that may compromise sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8263189      PMCID: PMC266195          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3023-3027.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in swabs and urine from men with non-gonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  H M Palmer; C B Gilroy; B J Thomas; P E Hay; C Gilchrist; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; S Birkelund; G Christiansen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of Chlamydia (Bedsonia) in certain infections of man. I. Laboratory procedures: comparison of yolk sac and cell culture for detection and isolation.

Authors:  F B Gordon; I A Harper; A L Quan; J D Treharne; R S Dwyer; J A Garland
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Confirmatory assay increases specificity of the chlamydiazyme test for Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

Authors:  J Moncada; J Schachter; G Bolan; J Engelman; L Howard; I Mushahwar; G Ridgway; G Mumtaz; W Stamm; A Clark
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of Syva's enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J Moncada; J Schachter; G Bolan; J Nathan; M A Shafer; A Clark; J Schwebke; W Stamm; T Mroczkowski; Z Seliborska
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Multicenter evaluation of the AntigEnz Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection.

Authors:  A Clark; W E Stamm; C Gaydos; L Welsh; T C Quinn; J Schachter; J Moncada
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in Mccoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  W E Stamm; M Tam; M Koester; L Cles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Microtest procedure for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  B L Yoder; W E Stamm; C M Koester; E R Alexander
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  B Dutilh; C Bébéar; P Rodriguez; A Vekris; J Bonnet; M Garret
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.992

View more
  52 in total

1.  Improved sensitivity of the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor assay using an optimized procedure for preparation of specimens.

Authors:  C Niederhauser; L Kaempf
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics.

Authors:  M A Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Development and validation of a rotor-gene real-time PCR assay for detection, identification, and quantification of Chlamydia trachomatis in a single reaction.

Authors:  Hamid Jalal; Hannah Stephen; Martin D Curran; Janet Burton; Michelle Bradley; Christopher Carne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Effect of urine specimen dilution on the performance of two commercial systems in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men.

Authors:  R Pasternack; P Vuorinen; A Miettinen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Evaluation of bias in diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity estimates computed by discrepant analysis.

Authors:  T A Green; C M Black; R E Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.

Authors:  Anthony W Solomon; Rosanna W Peeling; Allen Foster; David C W Mabey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Accuracy and interlaboratory reliability of human papillomavirus DNA testing by hybrid capture.

Authors:  M H Schiffman; N B Kiviat; R D Burk; K V Shah; R W Daniel; R Lewis; J Kuypers; M M Manos; D R Scott; M E Sherman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by Amplicor PCR: comparison of diagnostic performance with urine and cervical specimens.

Authors:  R Pasternack; P Vuorinen; A Kuukankorpi; T Pitkäjärvi; A Miettinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  M Puolakkainen; E Hiltunen-Back; T Reunala; S Suhonen; P Lähteenmäki; M Lehtinen; J Paavonen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.