Literature DB >> 11474015

Evaluation of COBAS AMPLICOR (Roche): accuracy in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by coamplification of endocervical specimens.

C H Livengood1, J W Wrenn.   

Abstract

We evaluated further the accuracy of the COBAS AMPLICOR (Roche) (CA) PCR-based system in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical specimens. Endocervical specimens collected for any indication for testing for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae among a university hospital health system population were included. Testing for C. trachomatis was done by two PCR methods, CA and manual microwell AMPLICOR (Roche) (MWA), and by culture; testing for N. gonorrhoeae was done by CA and culture. Discrepancy resolution was performed. Reproducibility testing and hands-on labor time measurements for CA were done. Among 654 C. trachomatis samples, the prevalence of true positivity was 9.2%, and among the 618 N. gonorrhoeae samples, the prevalence of true positivity was 4.4%. For detection of C. trachomatis, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were, respectively, as follows for each test: CA, 93.3, 99.7, 99.3, and 96.4%; MWA, 91.7, 99.7, 99.2, and 96.5%; and culture, 65.0, 100, 96.6, and 100%. For detection of N. gonorrhoeae those values were as follows: CA, 96.3, 100, 99.8, and 100%; and culture, 92.6, 100, 99.7, and 100%. Hands-on labor time for each clinical result was estimated to be at 7.5 min. The prevalence of inhibitory specimens was 3.5%, including two positive C. trachomatis samples which would have been missed otherwise. The direct cost of each clinical result with CA was estimated to be $9.09. Our methods include a diverse range of indications for testing among women, using endocervical swabbing samples, 2 M sucrose phosphate transport medium, and discrepancy resolution for comparison. Under our test conditions, the CA system is an accurate, rapid, and cost- and labor-efficient method for detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11474015      PMCID: PMC88262          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2928-2932.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  PCR testing of genital and urine specimens compared with culture for the diagnosis of chlamydial infection in men and women.

Authors:  H Young; A Moyes; K Horn; G R Scott; C Patrizio; S Sutherland
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.359

2.  1998 guidelines for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  1998-01-23

3.  Evaluation of automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR system for detection of several infectious agents and its impact on laboratory management.

Authors:  D Jungkind; S Direnzo; K G Beavis; N S Silverman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary specimens from men and women by a coamplification PCR assay.

Authors:  K A Crotchfelt; L E Welsh; D DeBonville; M Rosenstraus; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Direct fluorescent antibody testing for endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis: factors affecting accuracy.

Authors:  C H Livengood; J W Schmitt; W A Addison; J W Wrenn; K Magruder-Habib
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Comparison of Roche Cobas Amplicor and Abbott LCx for the rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in specimens from high-risk patients.

Authors:  O Steingrímsson; K Jónsdóttir; J H Olafsson; S M Karlsson; R Pálsdóttir; S Davídsson
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Detection of PCR inhibitors in cervical specimens by using the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis assay.

Authors:  R P Verkooyen; A Luijendijk; W M Huisman; W H Goessens; J A Kluytmans; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; H A Verbrugh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Inhibition of PCR in genital and urine specimens submitted for Chlamydia trachomatis testing.

Authors:  B Toye; W Woods; M Bobrowska; K Ramotar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Immunodiagnosis of sexually transmitted disease.

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct

10.  Performance of a commercial polymerase chain reaction test for endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a university hospital population.

Authors:  C H Livengood; K A Boggess; J W Wrenn; A P Murtha
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998
View more
  13 in total

1.  Confirmation by 16S rRNA PCR of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in a low-prevalence population.

Authors:  David J Diemert; Michael D Libman; Pierre Lebel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Nucleic acid amplification testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: an ongoing challenge.

Authors:  David M Whiley; John W Tapsall; Theo P Sloots
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  The laboratory diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Lai-King Ng; Irene E Martin
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  A fast real-time polymerase chain reaction method for sensitive and specific detection of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae porA pseudogene.

Authors:  Stig Ove Hjelmevoll; Merethe Elise Olsen; Johanna U Ericson Sollid; Håkon Haaheim; Magnus Unemo; Vegard Skogen
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Male circumcision and women's risk of incident chlamydial, gonococcal, and trichomonal infections.

Authors:  Abigail Norris Turner; Charles S Morrison; Nancy S Padian; Jay S Kaufman; Frieda M Behets; Robert A Salata; Francis A Mmiro; Tsungai Chipato; David D Celentano; Sungwal Rugpao; William C Miller
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Evaluation of the Digene Hybrid Capture II Assay with the Rapid Capture System for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  B Van Der Pol; J A Williams; N J Smith; B E Batteiger; A P Cullen; H Erdman; T Edens; K Davis; H Salim-Hammad; V W Chou; L Scearce; J Blutman; W J Payne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of Gen-Probe APTIMA-based Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis confirmatory testing in a metropolitan setting of high disease prevalence.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Vivian Boyd; Jolanta Czarnecka; Judy Griep; Brian Lund; Nancy Schaal; Jeanne E Hryciuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Ureaplasma urealyticum and U. parvum in sexually active women attending public health clinics in Brazil.

Authors:  T N Lobão; G B Campos; N N Selis; A T Amorim; S G Souza; S S Mafra; L S Pereira; D B Dos Santos; T B Figueiredo; L M Marques; J Timenetsky
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Molecular Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis in the United States.

Authors:  April L Harkins; Erik Munson
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-12

Review 10.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Seema Shetty; Christina Kouskouti; Uwe Schoen; Nikolaos Evangelatos; Shashidhar Vishwanath; Kapaettu Satyamoorthy; Franz Kainer; Angela Brand
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.