Literature DB >> 8253960

Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

C A Bass1, D L Jungkind, N S Silverman, J M Bondi.   

Abstract

A clinical evaluation of the Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.) is described. This new clinical system used one-step sample preparation, amplification with biotinylated cryptic plasmid primer pairs (CP24-CP27), uracil-N-glycosylase (AmpErase), and a microtiter format for amplicon capture and detection. Culture with McCoy cells in duplicate 1-dram (3.697-ml) vials with fluorescent immunostaining was the reference system. Endocervical swab samples from 945 women provided 74 culture-positive specimens, of which PCR detected 71. The initial PCR result was positive for 12 additional specimens. Arbitration of the PCR-positive, culture-negative samples by PCR with major outer membrane protein primers, duplicate culture, elementary body direct fluorescent-antibody staining, and DNA extraction PCR showed that all 12 samples were positive for chlamydia, raising the number of truly positive samples from 74 to 86. After arbitration the true sensitivities of PCR and culture were 96.5 and 86%, respectively (P = 0.02). Specificities for both were 100%. For PCR, the positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 99.7%, respectively. Total test efficiency was 99.7%. A high-test-volume (121 samples) timing study with all items included in the College of American Pathologists work load method indicated that this PCR format took approximately 3 min per sample. Because of the high sensitivity, specificity, and improved ease of handling, we found PCR to be a good alternative to culture for detection of C. trachomatis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8253960      PMCID: PMC265961          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2648-2653.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  H C Claas; W J Melchers; I H de Bruijn; M de Graaf; W C van Dijk; J Lindeman; W G Quint
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Detection of C trachomatis in urogenital specimens by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  H Näher; H Drzonek; J Wolf; M von Knebel Doeberitz; D Petzoldt
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

Review 3.  Current problems in microbiology: 1. Chlamydial infections: which laboratory test?

Authors:  G L Ridgway; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; S Birkelund; G Christiansen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active teenage girls. Lack of correlation between chlamydial infection, history of the patient and clinical signs of infection.

Authors:  V A Rahm; H Gnarpe; V Odlind
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1988-09

6.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  L Bobo; F Coutlee; R H Yolken; T Quinn; R P Viscidi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of a nonisotopic probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  G L Woods; A Young; J C Scott; T M Blair; A M Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  G Jaschek; C A Gaydos; L E Welsh; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Diagnostic value of the polymerase chain reaction for Chlamydia detection as determined in a follow-up study.

Authors:  H C Claas; J H Wagenvoort; H G Niesters; T T Tio; J H Van Rijsoort-Vos; W G Quint
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  36 in total

1.  Improved sensitivity of the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor assay using an optimized procedure for preparation of specimens.

Authors:  C Niederhauser; L Kaempf
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  An internal control for routine diagnostic PCR: design, properties, and effect on clinical performance.

Authors:  M Rosenstraus; Z Wang; S Y Chang; D DeBonville; J P Spadoro
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Use of a single swab in multi-microbe or flex trans transport medium for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by Roche Amplicor PCR and culture in specimens from two different patient populations.

Authors:  C K Fong; J Falcone; M L Landry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of 2-SP transport medium for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by two automated amplification systems and culture for chlamydia.

Authors:  O Dubuis; M Gorgievski-Hrisoho; D Germann; L Matter
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Evidence of labile inhibitors in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  A Clad; I Naudascher; U Flecken; H M Freidank; E E Petersen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Detection of endocervical anti-Chlamydia trachomatis immunoglobulin A in pregnant women by a rapid, 6-minute enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: comparison with PCR and chlamydial antigen detection methods.

Authors:  S S Witkin; A M Bongiovanni; S R Inglis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by Amplicor PCR: comparison of diagnostic performance with urine and cervical specimens.

Authors:  R Pasternack; P Vuorinen; A Kuukankorpi; T Pitkäjärvi; A Miettinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  G J van Doornum; M Buimer; M Prins; C J Henquet; R A Coutinho; P K Plier; S Tomazic-Allen; H Hu; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of characteristics of Q beta replicase-amplified assay with competitive PCR assay for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Q An; J Liu; W O'Brien; G Radcliffe; D Buxton; S Popoff; W King; M Vera-Garcia; L Lu; J Shah
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.