Literature DB >> 17021911

[Absorptiometry].

S Prevrhal1.   

Abstract

This article is an introduction to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the most widely used method today for diagnosis of osteoporosis. DXA can be used to assess projective bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, the proximal hip, and the whole body as well as the skeletal periphery at the forearm, the hand, and the heel. The prominent area of application of DXA is the diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis and its treatment. Because of its high accuracy, precision, and ability to predict osteoporotic fracture as well as its relatively low cost, DXA has prevailed over alternative methods. This article discusses the underlying X-ray physics and technological aspects, acquisition protocols, quality characteristics, and sources of error and their relevance. It also describes the various skeletal regions accessible to measurement, details on precision, nominal results, usability to predict fracture risk, and results of influential clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17021911     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-006-1414-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  61 in total

1.  Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P K Venesmaa; H P Kröger; H J Miettinen; J S Jurvelin; O T Suomalainen; E M Alhava
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  A METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE DEGREE OF MINERALIZATION OF BONES FROM TRACINGS OF ROENTGENOGRAMS.

Authors:  P B Mack; A T O'brien; J M Smith; A W Bauman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1939-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Universal standardization of bone density measurements: a method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments.

Authors:  S L Hui; S Gao; X H Zhou; C C Johnston; Y Lu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; H Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: comparison of visual examination and process-control charts.

Authors:  Y Lu; A K Mathur; B A Blunt; C C Gluer; A S Will; T P Fuerst; M D Jergas; K N Andriano; S R Cummings; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship.

Authors:  S Hagiwara; K Engelke; S O Yang; M S Dhillon; G Guglielmi; D L Nelson; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: the precision of paired anteroposterior/lateral studies.

Authors:  G M Blake; T Jagathesan; R J Herd; I Fogelman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurements in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population.

Authors:  P D Miller; S L Bonnick; C J Rosen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the patient positioning during DXA measurements in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Alp Cetin; Erkan Ozgüçlü; Levent Ozçakar; Ayşen Akinci
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  [Radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis].

Authors:  A S Issever; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Pitfalls and difficulties in interpretation of bone densitometry].

Authors:  R Scholz; G Borte; G von Salis-Soglio; C-E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.