| Literature DB >> 27942979 |
Luke Arentsen1, Karen E Hansen2, Masashi Yagi3, Yutaka Takahashi4, Ryan Shanley4, Angela McArthur5, Patrick Bolan6, Taiki Magome4, Douglas Yee4,7, Jerry Froelich8, Susanta K Hui9,10,11.
Abstract
Temporal and spatial variations in bone marrow adipose tissue (MAT) can be indicative of several pathologies and confound current methods of assessing immediate changes in bone mineral remodeling. We present a novel dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) method to monitor MAT and marrow-corrected volumetric BMD (mcvBMD) throughout the body. Twenty-three cancellous skeletal sites in 20 adult female cadavers aged 40-80 years old were measured using DECT (80 and 140 kVp). vBMD was simultaneous recorded using QCT. MAT was further sampled using MRI. Thirteen lumbar vertebrae were then excised from the MRI-imaged donors and examined by microCT. After MAT correction throughout the skeleton, significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between QCT-derived vBMD and DECT-derived mcvBMD results. McvBMD was highly heterogeneous with a maximum at the posterior skull and minimum in the proximal humerus (574 and 0.7 mg/cc, respectively). BV/TV and BMC have a nearly significant correlation with mcvBMD (r = 0.545, p = 0.057 and r = 0.539, p = 0.061, respectively). MAT assessed by DECT showed a significant correlation with MRI MAT results (r = 0.881, p < 0.0001). Both DECT- and MRI-derived MAT had a significant influence on uncorrected vBMD (r = -0.86 and r = -0.818, p ≤ 0.0001, respectively). Conversely, mcvBMD had no correlation with DECT- or MRI-derived MAT (r = 0.261 and r = 0.067). DECT can be used to assess MAT while simultaneously collecting mcvBMD values at each skeletal site. MAT is heterogeneous throughout the skeleton, highly variable, and should be accounted for in longitudinal mcvBMD studies. McvBMD accurately reflects the calcified tissue in cancellous bone.Entities:
Keywords: Dual-energy CT; Marrow-corrected bone mineral density; Whole-body imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27942979 PMCID: PMC5689468 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-016-0796-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bone Miner Metab ISSN: 0914-8779 Impact factor: 2.626