Literature DB >> 1584146

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: the effects of beam hardening on bone density measurements.

G M Blake1, D B McKeeney, S C Chhaya, P J Ryan, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

X-ray tubes have superseded radionuclide sources for dual photon absorptiometry of the spine and hip. However, the use of a polyenergetic spectrum is a potential source of error for x-ray absorptiometers since beam hardening may result in a nonlinear measurement scale for bone mineral density (BMD). A quantitative study of the effects of beam hardening on measurements made with a commercial dual energy x-ray scanner has been performed. Bone was represented by layers of aluminum of linearly increasing thickness which were scanned under water thicknesses ranging from 0 to 25 cm to represent different body thicknesses of soft tissue. Beam hardening had two effects on measured BMD: (i) at a constant true BMD, measured BMD varied with water thickness; (ii) at a constant water thickness, the BMD scale was not precisely linear. For conditions appropriate to spine and hip studies (BMD) values in the range 0.7 to 1.4 g/cm2 and body thickness between 15 and 25 cm) the maximum deviation of measured BMD from a linear scale was 0.023 g/cm2, while the root-mean-square deviation (0.01 g/cm2) was comparable to the measurement precision for a spine or femoral neck scan (about 1%). The largest departures from linearity were found to occur at the thinnest water thicknesses for BMD values in the range 0.2 to 0.6 g/cm2. The effect of scale nonlinearity on the results of longitudinal studies was examined: for a spine scan at 20-cm body thickness, measured changes in BMD slightly overestimated the true change and implied an error of 0.15%/year for a measurement of a true rate of loss of 3% year in a postmenopausal woman.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1584146     DOI: 10.1118/1.596834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of different techniques to measure body composition in moderately active adolescents.

Authors:  A De Lorenzo; I Bertini; N Candeloro; L Iacopino; A Andreoli; M D Van Loan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck in vitro.

Authors:  J W Kuiper; C van Kuijk; J L Grashuis; A G Ederveen; H E Schütte
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Random field assessment of inhomogeneous bone mineral density from DXA scans can enhance the differentiation between postmenopausal women with and without hip fractures.

Authors:  Xuanliang Neil Dong; Rajeshwar Pinninti; Timothy Lowe; Patricia Cussen; Joyce E Ballard; David Di Paolo; Mukul Shirvaikar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Recent advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-09

5.  Mass attenuation coefficients, quantities and units for use in bone mineral determinations.

Authors:  R Jonson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Phantom studies in osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Fischer; B Kempers
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-05

7.  Determination of linear x-ray attenuation coefficients of pathological brain tissues and use of filters in tissue contrast enhancement in computed tomography.

Authors:  M Erdem Sagsoz; Fazlı Erdogan; Salih Z Erzeneoglu; İhsan Yuce
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2010-08

Review 8.  Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2. The use of bone density measurement in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  W Sturtridge; B Lentle; D A Hanley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Stochastic predictors from the DXA scans of human lumbar vertebrae are correlated with the microarchitecture parameters of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Xuanliang Neil Dong; Rajeshwar Pinninti; Amy Tvinnereim; Timothy Lowe; David Di Paolo; Mukul Shirvaikar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Premenopausal overweight women do not lose bone during moderate weight loss with adequate or higher calcium intake.

Authors:  Claudia S Riedt; Yvette Schlussel; Nancy von Thun; Hasina Ambia-Sobhan; Theodore Stahl; M Paul Field; Robert M Sherrell; Sue A Shapses
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.