Literature DB >> 1785372

Calibration of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone density.

R B Mazess1, J A Trempe, J P Bisek, J A Hanson, D Hans.   

Abstract

Bone mineral content (BMC, g) using DEXA (Lunar DPX) was measured on known hydroxyapatite samples in a water bath in the presence of uniform and nonuniform covering of fat-equivalent materials. Selective placement of paraffin over bone had a greater effect than lard in reducing apparent BMC, and polycarbonate plastic had a lesser effect. Measured BMC was 100.1 +/- 1.1% of actual hydroxyapatite weight when (1) fat over bone was about twice the mass of hydroxyapatite, and (2) the surrounding soft tissue was 15-30% fat. There was a linear relationship between observed and expected BMC, area (cm2), and bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) measured on an aluminum phantom using either the Lunar DPX or the Hologic QDR-1000. The measured area with the two densitometers was identical, but BMC differed. For both an anthropomorphic phantom and human subjects, use of a constant-threshold (0.2 g/cm2) edge-detection algorithm excluded less low-density bone from the transverse processes than the standard DPX edge-detection algorithm. Differences in edge detection could influence the results obtained with phantoms and in vivo and make system intercomparison difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1785372     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650060804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  9 in total

1.  Cigarette smoking, steroid hormones, and bone mineral density in young women.

Authors:  M Daniel; A D Martin; D T Drinkwater
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck in vitro.

Authors:  J W Kuiper; C van Kuijk; J L Grashuis; A G Ederveen; H E Schütte
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Evaluation of the European Spine Phantom in a multi-centre clinical trial.

Authors:  B Lees; S W Garland; C Walton; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  M A Sabin; G M Blake; S M MacLaughlin-Black; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group.

Authors:  J Pearson; J Dequeker; M Henley; J Bright; J Reeve; W Kalender; A M Laval-Jeantet; P Rüegsegger; D Felsenberg; J Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries.

Authors:  Ae Ja Park; Jee-Hye Choi; Hyun Kang; Ki Jeong Park; Ha Young Kim; Seo Hwa Kim; Deog-Yoon Kim; Seung-Hwan Park; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2015-05-31

7.  The influence of aortic calcification on spinal bone mineral density in vitro.

Authors:  H Hoshino; K Kushida; M Takahashi; T Ohishi; E Sugiyama; T Inoue
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Long-term persistence with denosumab: real-world data from the Austrian Osteoporosis Clinic (AOC). A retrospective data analysis.

Authors:  Ewald Boschitsch; Oliver Naegele; Anita Klinger; Harald Brix-Samoylenko
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The effect of increasing gap width on localized densitometric changes within tibial ostectomies in a canine model.

Authors:  M D Markel; J J Bogdanske
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.