Literature DB >> 12915958

Prevalence of osteoporosis using bone mineral measurements at the calcaneus by dual X-ray and laser (DXL).

R Kullenberg1, J A Falch.   

Abstract

Using manufacturers reference data the prevalence of osteoporosis using a T-score threshold of -2.5 for heel measurements by DXL technology was compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements at the femoral neck, spine and forearm. The prevalence of osteoporosis for women aged 50 years or older was 28% for DXL measurements of the heel bone and 30, 22 and 32% for DXA measurements of the lumbar spine, femoral neck and forearm respectively. Bone mineral density (BMD) was also measured by DXL in the heel bone and by DXA in spine and femoral neck in 251 women (mean age 62 +/- 14.5 years) when attending an osteoporosis clinic. The sensitivity and specificity for osteoporosis and osteopenia for the DXL measurements were calculated assuming a low T-score at the spine or femoral neck as the criterion for a correct diagnosis. The sensitivity was found to be 80% for osteoporosis and 82% for osteopenia and the specificity was 82% for osteoporosis and 89% for osteopenia. We conclude that DXL measurement at the heel bone, using a T-score threshold of -2.5 for classification of osteoporosis, is in concordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915958     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1442-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  17 in total

1.  Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck in vitro.

Authors:  J W Kuiper; C van Kuijk; J L Grashuis; A G Ederveen; H E Schütte
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Selection of the optimal skeletal site for fracture risk prediction.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; L K Heilbrun; J M Vogel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. A quantitative study of 84 iliac bone biopsies.

Authors:  P Meunier; J Aaron; C Edouard; G Vignon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The clinical relevance of calcaneus bone mineral measurements: a review.

Authors:  J M Vogel; R D Wasnich; P D Ross
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-10

Review 5.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

6.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

8.  Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; H K Genant; M C Nevitt; L Palermo; W Browner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Discordance in patient classification using T-scores.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; E von Stetten; P Miller
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use?

Authors:  G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  13 in total

1.  Physical activity is the strongest predictor of calcaneal peak bone mass in young Swedish men.

Authors:  U Pettersson; M Nilsson; V Sundh; D Mellström; M Lorentzon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The relationship between the calcaneal bone mineral density and the mental index in post-menopausal females.

Authors:  E Jagelaviciene; A Krasauskiene; R Zalinkevicius; R Kubilius; I Vaitkeviciene
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  The relation between bone mineral density in the heel and pixel intensity in the mandibular jaw bone among elderly women.

Authors:  L Hedström; A Baigi; H Bergh
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  The value of laboratory tests in diagnosing secondary osteoporosis at a fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic.

Authors:  Gijs de Klerk; J Han Hegeman; Detlef van der Velde; Job van der Palen; Leo van Bergeijk; Henk J Ten Duis
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2013-06

5.  Skeletal effects and growth in children with chronic kidney disease: a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Diana Swolin-Eide; Sverker Hansson; Per Magnusson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Bone mineral density measurement in the calcaneus with DXL: comparison with hip and spine measurements in a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population.

Authors:  H Salminen; M Sääf; H Ringertz; L-E Strender
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Hip and fragility fracture prediction by 4-item clinical risk score and mobile heel BMD: a women cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel Albertsson; Dan Mellström; Christer Petersson; Hans Thulesius; Robert Eggertsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Calcaneal BMD Obtained by Dual X-Ray and Laser Predicts Future Hip Fractures-A Prospective Study on 4 398 Swedish Women.

Authors:  Torkel B Brismar; Imre Janszky; L I M Toft
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-10

9.  The discriminatory capacity of BMD measurements by DXA and dual X-ray and laser (DXL) at the calcaneus including clinical risk factors for detecting patients with vertebral fractures.

Authors:  C Muschitz; H P Dimai; R Kocijan; A Kaider; A Zendeli; F Kühne; A Trubrich; S Lung; R Waneck; H Resch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The value of calcaneal bone mass measurement using a dual X-ray laser Calscan device in risk screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Gulseren Kayalar; Alev Cevikol; Gunes Yavuzer; Yavuz Sanisoglu; Aytul Cakci; Tansu Arasil
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.