Literature DB >> 8783294

Accuracy and precision study in vitro for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

M Takada1, K Engelke, S Hagiwara, S Grampp, H K Genant.   

Abstract

We evaluated the accuracy and precision of a peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scanner, the Stratec XCT-960, using 12 human cadaveric forearms. The accuracy was determined by comparing the total bone mineral content (BMC) with the ash weight (AW). We scanned and ashed three consecutive slices (thickness 2.5 mm) at the standard position (s-position) and at 2.5 mm both proximal and distal to the s-position. The correlation coefficient between the AW and total BMC using slices at the s-position was r = 0.87 with an accuracy error (random component) of 15.5%. The correlation coefficient using all slices was r = 0.90 with an accuracy error of 14.3%. The correlation coefficient improved to r = 0.95 with an accuracy error of 9.7% after averaging the results of all three slices for each forearm. The short-term precision error expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) of bone mineral density (BMD) and BMC was determined by measuring the forearms five times either with repositioning or without repositioning. The CVs with repositioning were 2.77 and 1.15 for total BMD and BMC, 1.85 for trabecular BMD; without repositioning they were 0.29, 0.58 and 0.69 respectively. To further evaluate the influence of positioning, additional scans were performed at 1, 2 and 5 mm proximal, and 1 and 2 mm distal to the s-position. BMD and BMC were greatly influenced by the scan location; for example, the percentage differences in trabecular BMD 1 mm distal and proximal relative to the s-position were 2.5% +/- 5.1% and 0.18% +/- 6.3%, respectively. The Stratec XCT-960 appears to be a moderately accurate and highly precise scanner with potential usefulness for evaluating BMC and BMD of ultradistal radius.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8783294     DOI: 10.1007/bf01622736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of single-photon and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the radius.

Authors:  D Nelson; M Feingold; E Mascha; M Kleerekoper
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1992-07

2.  Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J W Nieves; F Cosman; C Mars; R Lindsay
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  M S Leboff; G E Fuleihan; J E Angell; S Chung; K Curtis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  G Larcos; H W Wahner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  S Grampp; P Lang; M Jergas; C C Glüer; A Mathur; K Engelke; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative computed tomography (QCT): accuracy of single and dual energy measurements.

Authors:  C C Glüer; U J Reiser; C A Davis; B K Rutt; H K Genant
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Quantitative computed tomography at peripheral measuring sites.

Authors:  P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1988

8.  European semi-anthropomorphic phantom for the cross-calibration of peripheral bone densitometers: assessment of precision accuracy and stability.

Authors:  J Pearson; P Ruegsegger; J Dequeker; M Henley; J Bright; J Reeve; W Kalender; D Felsenberg; A M Laval-Jeantet; J E Adams
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1994-11

9.  Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship.

Authors:  S Hagiwara; K Engelke; S O Yang; M S Dhillon; G Guglielmi; D L Nelson; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung; M S Schmeer; L A Roberts; K W Gaither
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reproducibility of peripheral quantitative computed tomography measurements at the radius and tibia in healthy pre- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Kristina A Szabo; Colin E Webber; Christopher Gordon; Jonathan D Adachi; Richard Tozer; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.248

2.  Accuracy of pQCT for evaluating the aged human radius: an ashing, histomorphometry and failure load investigation.

Authors:  M C Ashe; K M Khan; S A Kontulainen; P Guy; D Liu; T J Beck; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Well-nourished cystic fibrosis patients have normal mineral density, but reduced cortical thickness at the forearm.

Authors:  O Louis; P Clerinx; I Gies; E De Wachter; J De Schepper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The impact of accurate positioning on measurements made by peripheral QCT in the distal radius.

Authors:  E J Marjanovic; K A Ward; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Peripheral QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Ito; K Tsurusaki; K Hayashi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Estimation of whole body fat from appendicular soft tissue from peripheral quantitative computed tomography in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Vinson R Lee; Rob M Blew; Josh N Farr; Rita Tomas; Timothy G Lohman; Scott B Going
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2013

Review 7.  Methods for measurement of pediatric bone.

Authors:  Teresa L Binkley; Ryan Berry; Bonny L Specker
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  Bone loss. Quantitative imaging techniques for assessing bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C F Njeh; H K Genant
Journal:  Arthritis Res       Date:  2000-08-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.