Literature DB >> 8686514

Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.

S Grampp1, P Lang, M Jergas, C C Glüer, A Mathur, K Engelke, H K Genant.   

Abstract

In order to assess precision of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), duplicate bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the radius were performed in 20 healthy premenopausal, 20 healthy postmenopausal, and 20 osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a Stratec XCT-960 system. The short-term reproductibility in vivo for the total, trabecular, and cortical regions of interest (ROI) was expressed as the absolute precision error (standard deviation, SD) and as the relative precision error (SD/mean x 100, or coefficient of variation, CV, in %). Reproducibility in vivo was good in all volunteers but was influenced by the study group and the ROI. The precision error for trabecular BMD was 3 mg/cm3, or about 1.6%. This is large relative to the aging decrease of 0.22%/year, or to the difference (12 mg/cm3, or 7%) between osteoporotic women and postmenopausal controls. In order to compare pQCT to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm and at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), 40 premenopausal healthy controls, 40 postmenopausal healthy controls, and 35 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were assessed. DXA measurements performed at the ultradistal, middistal, 1/3, and total ROI of the radius showed only moderate correlations between r = 0.38--0.75, r = 0.27--0.64, and r = 0.38--0.53 for the comparison versus pQCT total BMD, versus pQCT trabecular BMD, and versus pQCT cortical BMD, respectively. Correlations of DXA at the lumbar spine and pQCT were between r = 0.18 and 0.44. DXA at radius and spine was able to discriminate between post- menopausal controls and osteoporotic women (p = 0.001--.004),but BMD measurements by pQCT did not show this ability (p = 0.15--0.52). However, two nonstandard pQCT parameters, namely the surface area of the cortical bone and the cortical BMC were factors that discriminated well between these two groups (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, respectively). These pQCT parameters also yielded the highest relative annual changes in pre- and post-menopausal control subjects. The measurement of cortical bone in the distal radius proved to be a good predictor of vertebral fracture status and was a good indicator of age-related skeletal change. Our data emphasize the importance of cortical measurements when using pQCT of the radius to assess osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8686514     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650101019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  21 in total

1.  Which bone densitometry and which skeletal site are clinically useful for monitoring bone mass?

Authors:  Masako Ito; Akifumi Nishida; Jun Kono; Mika Kono; Masataka Uetani; Kuniaki Hayashi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Short-term in vivo precision of BMD and parameters of trabecular architecture at the distal forearm and tibia.

Authors:  K Engelke; B Stampa; W Timm; B Dardzinski; A E de Papp; H K Genant; T Fuerst
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Reproducibility of peripheral quantitative computed tomography measurements at the radius and tibia in healthy pre- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Kristina A Szabo; Colin E Webber; Christopher Gordon; Jonathan D Adachi; Richard Tozer; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 4.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Peripheral QCT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Ito; K Tsurusaki; K Hayashi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Volumetric bone mineral density using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in Japanese women.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; T Inoue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Monitoring time interval for pQCT-derived bone outcomes in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R L Duckham; A W Frank; J D Johnston; W P Olszynski; S A Kontulainen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Estimation of whole body fat from appendicular soft tissue from peripheral quantitative computed tomography in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Vinson R Lee; Rob M Blew; Josh N Farr; Rita Tomas; Timothy G Lohman; Scott B Going
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2013

10.  Smoking is a predictor of worse trabecular mechanical performance in hip fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  Ana Maria Rodrigues; Joana Caetano-Lopes; Ana Catarina Vale; Inês Aleixo; Ana Sofia Pena; Alexandra Faustino; Alexandre Sepriano; Joaquim Polido-Pereira; Elsa Vieira-Sousa; Raquel Lucas; José Carlos Romeu; Jacinto Monteiro; Maria Fátima Vaz; João Eurico Fonseca; Helena Canhão
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.