Literature DB >> 8055368

Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry.

K G Faulkner1, M R McClung, M S Schmeer, L A Roberts, K W Gaither.   

Abstract

Though spinal and femoral measurements are typically preferred for evaluating skeletal density, an abundance of forearm data exists, primarily from single photon absorptiometry (SPA) devices. Most dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners are capable of scanning the forearm and provide analysis tools to duplicate conventional SPA measurements. In this study, we have compared the radius density measurements from three commonly available densitometers: a Norland 278 SPA, a Lunar DPX-L, and a Hologic 1000/W. Radius bone mineral density (BMD) on the nondominant forearm was measured in 28 volunteers (21 women and 7 men) aged 24-78, with an average age of 51 +/- 17 years. Values were compared and regression relationships derived at corresponding measurement sites. SPA and DXA BMD values were found to be highly correlated (r = 0.99) with small standard errors (0.014 g/cm2-0.021 g/cm2), though significant absolute differences were observed at most measurement regions. Correlation slopes ranged from 0.85 to 1.04, with intercepts from 0.01 to 0.08 g/cm2. Using the resultant regression equations, SPA BMD values can be converted to DXA values with an expected error of roughly 3%. DXA BMD can also be interconverted between Lunar and Hologic with a similar expected error. In situations where this level of imprecision is acceptable, patient forearm measurements obtained on different systems can be interconverted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8055368     DOI: 10.1007/bf00301680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of single-photon and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the radius.

Authors:  D Nelson; M Feingold; E Mascha; M Kleerekoper
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1992-07

2.  Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J W Nieves; F Cosman; C Mars; R Lindsay
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  M S Leboff; G E Fuleihan; J E Angell; S Chung; K Curtis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius.

Authors:  R S Weinstein; K D New; L J Sappington
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  G Larcos; H W Wahner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Accuracy and precision study in vitro for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  M Takada; K Engelke; S Hagiwara; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Borg; A Møllgaard; B J Riis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.