Literature DB >> 1642152

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry.

M S Leboff1, G E Fuleihan, J E Angell, S Chung, K Curtis.   

Abstract

Although single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) has been the predominant tool used to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in the forearm, the development of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) provides the benefits of greater source stability, reduced scanning time, and improved image resolution compared to SPA. In the present study we used the DEXA bone densitometer (Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA) to (1) measure BMD in the one-third radius and ultradistal radius; (2) examine the reproducibility of these BMD measurements; and (3) compare the BMD at the one-third radius with SPA (SP2, Lunar Corp., Madison, WI). In 65 normal women (ages 22-74 years) we examined changes in the forearm DEXA BMD with age, revealing significant quadratic regression equations. The reproducibility of DEXA BMD (mean +/- SEM) in 7 normal subjects aged 22-50 years is 0.85 +/- 0.16% for the predominantly cortical one-third radius site and 0.97 +/- 0.15% for the more trabecular ultradistal site. The regression relationship between DEXA and SPA of the one-third radius in 26 subjects (ages 22-68 years) is DEXA BMD = 0.105 + 0.826 (SPA BMD); R = 0.97, R2 = 0.94, p less than 0.0001. Bone densitometry of the forearm using DEXA may be performed relatively rapidly, providing reproducibility and image resolution that are generally superior to those observed with SPA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1642152     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  8 in total

1.  Radial bone density and breast cancer risk in white and African-American women.

Authors:  D A Nelson; L L Darga; M S Simon; R K Severson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Familial aggregation of forearm bone mineral density in Chinese.

Authors:  Xiumei Hong; Tianhua Niu; Changzhong Chen; Binyan Wang; Scott A Venners; Zhian Fang; Xiping Xu
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Accuracy and precision study in vitro for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  M Takada; K Engelke; S Hagiwara; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung; M S Schmeer; L A Roberts; K W Gaither
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data.

Authors:  T L Kelly; G Crane; D T Baran
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  Lisa Forsén; Gro K Rosvold Berntsen; Haakon E Meyer; Grethe S Tell; Vinjar Fønnebø
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Peripheral bone density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Helmut Franck; Jurgen Gottwalt
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.980

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.